Re: Infantry Officers Carrying Cavalry Swords
I wish I had some evidence to share on this thread. Personally, when I am doing an officer, I carry either an M1850 Foot Officer's Sword (an original) or an M1850 Staff and Field (repro). I love how light the foot is, but also love the length of the staff and field. As reenactors, we never have to consider using our swords for real combat. While we have all sorts of nice statistics telling us how few wounds were caused by swords, the officers back then had no way of knowing that, certainly not at the start of the war when many were out buying their swords. I think generally, there are three kinds of swords
1. The swords that are so utterly useless that they could never be put into combat, such as the M1860 Staff and Field. Great for generals who sit on horses, not so much for a guy actually on the line.
2. Swords that look tougher but still don't really have a great combat record. I would generally put the foot officer's sword here. Its too short to really be of use, especially against someone with a bayonet.
3. Combat swords. I think of cavalry sabers especially here, swords that are big, long, and ugly, but you know they'll inflict some damage.
I'd love to get an M1833 Dragoon Saber at some point. Its long and straight, perfect for someone as tall as me (6'1"). I'll live with the sword hanging between my legs, but I feel there were probably a few officers who wanted a sword that would take down some bodies. Just my $.02 on the mater. If people can find some more examples, please post 'em!
I wish I had some evidence to share on this thread. Personally, when I am doing an officer, I carry either an M1850 Foot Officer's Sword (an original) or an M1850 Staff and Field (repro). I love how light the foot is, but also love the length of the staff and field. As reenactors, we never have to consider using our swords for real combat. While we have all sorts of nice statistics telling us how few wounds were caused by swords, the officers back then had no way of knowing that, certainly not at the start of the war when many were out buying their swords. I think generally, there are three kinds of swords
1. The swords that are so utterly useless that they could never be put into combat, such as the M1860 Staff and Field. Great for generals who sit on horses, not so much for a guy actually on the line.
2. Swords that look tougher but still don't really have a great combat record. I would generally put the foot officer's sword here. Its too short to really be of use, especially against someone with a bayonet.
3. Combat swords. I think of cavalry sabers especially here, swords that are big, long, and ugly, but you know they'll inflict some damage.
I'd love to get an M1833 Dragoon Saber at some point. Its long and straight, perfect for someone as tall as me (6'1"). I'll live with the sword hanging between my legs, but I feel there were probably a few officers who wanted a sword that would take down some bodies. Just my $.02 on the mater. If people can find some more examples, please post 'em!
Comment