Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Non-Enfield English Muskets and Rifles

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Non-Enfield English Muskets and Rifles

    Gents,

    Over the past days I have been going over ordnance records for deep south and western depots, and one thing that I find surprising is the large numbers of Non-Enfield British muskets and rifles I see. For example, on June 2nd 1864, the Macon Arsenal sent to Lt. Cunningham, O.O. at Savannah:

    1320 Tower Muskets cal .75
    140 Tower Muskets cal .70
    100 Tower Rifles cal .70

    I have seen another record showing that the garrison at Vicksburg was sent 1000 English Muskets in December 1862. I also know the 48th North Carolina was issued a large number of English Muskets when organized in 1862 and the 27th Louisiana was issued old British Brunswick rifles.

    I find it an interesting subject, perhaps having a few in our ranks wouldn't hurt....

    Will MacDonald

  • #2
    Re: Non-Enfield English Muskets and Rifles

    Dang, I thought my .69 cal bore was hard to feed, I can only imagine getting a .75 to fire right without ramming paper.
    Mike McGee
    Cure All Mess ~ Hard Case Boys
    Co A, 4th Tennessee Infantry Regiment "The Shelby Greys"
    Co C, 25th Regiment, Indiana Infantry


    Pvt. Francis "Frank" Agee- G, G, G-Uncle
    Co H, 22nd Tennessee Infantry Regiment
    KIA Battle of Shiloh-April 6, 1862
    Resting in Peace on that Hallowed Ground

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Non-Enfield English Muskets and Rifles

      "Just a few in our ranks"

      One would think the Quartermaster, especially on the Federal side, would have the common sense to issue muskets purchased like this, to entire companies if for no other reason the issuance of ammunition. And, the individual soldier, who needed ammo, wouldn't want some odd ball caliber, just in case he needed ammo in the middle of something important.

      And, on the Southern side, with the amount of odd ball stuff they were purchasing, just to supply their ranks, the same would hold true, even more so.

      Imagine trying to get companies with these odd calibers supplied. The North had the ways and means to get most of thei odd stuff out of service. The South just had to deal with it.

      One or two in the ranks, poor representation of history. Get a whole company with them, true to history in the right unit or regiment.
      [FONT="Book Antiqua"]"Grumpy" Dave Towsen
      Past President Potomac Legion
      Long time member Columbia Rifles
      Who will care for Mother now?[/FONT]

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Non-Enfield English Muskets and Rifles

        Dave,

        As you well know, common since doesn't often win out. I will have to find the specific order but right before the Vicksburg campaign U.S. Grant had to order his men to switch arms between companies because there was such a mixture of arms in them. And in the C.S. army? Forget it, especially out west. A company or even a regiment may have been armed the same when in the camp of instruction, but once out in the field it became a very different story. Broken guns, new recruits, and men coming back from hospital ensured that at any one time there were unarmed men in every regiment and the Ordnance officers clearly struggled to arm them all. For Example, during the Atlanta Campaign I have seen some regiments get sent 4 or 5 different kinds of long arms to make up for shortages at the front. So you could see a mix of Austrian Rifles, Enfields, .69 cal Smoothbores, and even various "Rifles cal .58".

        And don't get me started about western C.S. Cavalry.....

        Will MacDonald

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Non-Enfield English Muskets and Rifles

          And don't get me started about western C.S. Cavalry.....
          Ah yes.....The wild card of "anything goes"!
          Andrew Verdon

          7th Tennessee Cavalry Company D

          Tennessee Plowboy #1 of the "Far Flung Mess"

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Non-Enfield English Muskets and Rifles

            All,

            Lon Webster's very fine treatise "Entrepot" details some pretty substantial numbers of "non-Enfield" English arms run in from afar. While the better known Enfields and Lorenzes get plentiful coverage, much of Europe was ridding its arsenals of antiquated and older firearms to the weapons-needed Americans.

            Regards,
            Fred Baker

            "You may call a Texian anything but a gentleman or a coward." Zachary Taylor

            Comment

            Working...
            X