If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
John,
Not sure if you are questioning the dimensions of any specific maker's reproduction, but I can say that I had this same question after purchasing a Dress Hat from one of the popular vendors. The brim on mine was at least 4". I carefully cut it down to 3 1/4" and had the edge binding re-stitched. It just didn't look right at 4" so I went with the prescribed measurements and it looks much better.
As [one of our cavalry] passed by, the general halted him and inquired "what part of the army he belonged to." "I don't belong to the army, I belong to the cavalry." "That's a fact," says [the general], "you can pass on." Silas Grisamore, 18th Louisiana
The originals are fur felt, not wool felt, although many cheap reproductions are wool. Here's a more recent article that was originally published about 2001. I've forgotten what magazine is was published in.
DB now advertises his dress hats can be had in either nutria or beaver. Although these would be types of fur felt, neither of these were specified for use in original dress hats and the nutria was not introduced into North America until the 20th Century. The original specification was for rabbit fur (a mix of 8 parts Russia Hare and 1 part Scotch Coney). There may have been other substitutions by wartime contractors, but I am not immediately aware of them.
Looking at the 1858 regs, it would appear that 3.25x6.25 (brim x crown height) is the specification. Anyone seen an original hat to that spec?
Most originals surveyed in articles appear to be 3" x 5 1/2" to 5 7/8".
I have seen a number listed on auction sites listed with 3" brims, but no listing of crown height. Also, those measurements were for an auction description, not making a survey of dimensions. So, who knows how precise they were trying to be.
I see that the "server is busy try again later" has eaten my reply.
Let's see...
With clothing, and kit, one does find measurements that are off the "manual specs." We NUG attribute that to inspectors not rejecting sme minor deviations when goods were need just because a spec was slightly amiss. I suspect the same was true for hats.
I also hold the theory that like clothing, hats were subject to measurement variations based upon the size of the hat. But I do not have data or access to enough original hats to take measurements to prove or disprove the hypothesis.
Also does any 0ne has saved/referenced an old article or ancient posting about dress hats that talks about the differences between the so-called "M1858" and the "M1861" dress hat? (I lost mine in the dead hard drive disaster...)
When we look at originals there seems to be two types- one with sorter crown and more tapered sides, and one with a taller crown and more straighter sides. I have seen this referred to as the basis for what is a "M1858" and what is "M1861" dress hat.
But, I am thinking, or misremembering on this one, that that may be, have been a modern vendorism or reenactorism- and the old article or post may shed some light on that.
???
Thanks.
Curt
Curt Schmidt
In gleichem Schritt und Tritt, Curt Schmidt
-Hard and sharp as flint...secret, and self-contained, and solitary as an oyster.
-Haplogroup R1b M343 (Subclade R1b1a2 M269)
-Pointless Folksy Wisdom Mess, Oblio Lodge #1
-Vastly Ignorant
-Often incorrect, technically, historically, factually.
Comment