Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1862 LA Co. Enfield - Smithsonian Collection

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1862 LA Co. Enfield - Smithsonian Collection

    I thought members might enjoy seeing what a mint London Armory Company Enfield looks like.

    This piece is in the collection of the Smithsonian National Museum of American History in Washington DC:
    The .577 caliber British Pattern 1853 Rifle-Musket was the second most widely used firearm of the Civil War. A favorite of Confederate soldiers, it was also imported by the Union to keep up with the demand for rifles.Currently not on view


    Enjoy!
    John Wickett
    Former Carpetbagger
    Administrator (We got rules here! Be Nice - Sign Your Name - No Farbisms)

  • #2
    Re: 1862 LA Co. Enfield - Smithsonian Collection

    Beautiful weapon Wick!

    Did you happen to notice that the muzzle was scuffed up a little from the bayonet socket?
    Tyler Underwood
    Moderator
    Pawleys Island #409 AFM
    Governor Guards, WIG

    Click here for the AC rules.

    The search function located in the upper right corner of the screen is your friend.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: 1862 LA Co. Enfield - Smithsonian Collection

      The detail of the rust-blue on the barrel is fantastic!
      Also, notice the appearance of the case hardening on the lock and hammer. Not the decorative "swirls" you see on "high end" flip-lever guns… more similar to the even finish on, for example, the hammer and trigger of a WW2 Smith & Wesson "Victory" model. Function, not decoration!


      When you look at the shape of the side panels and other contours of the stock, the round-eared washers for the lock screws, and other details, I think it is clear that it is a much shorter path from a Parker-Hale to a LACo for those who want to do a defarb.
      John Wickett
      Former Carpetbagger
      Administrator (We got rules here! Be Nice - Sign Your Name - No Farbisms)

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: 1862 LA Co. Enfield - Smithsonian Collection

        I have an 1860 date LAC that I will post pictures of next time I get it out of the safe.
        Virgil Roberts

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: 1862 LA Co. Enfield - Smithsonian Collection

          Originally posted by 44th Miss Inf View Post
          I have an 1860 date LAC that I will post pictures of next time I get it out of the safe.
          Would love to see that! Thank you!
          John Wickett
          Former Carpetbagger
          Administrator (We got rules here! Be Nice - Sign Your Name - No Farbisms)

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: 1862 LA Co. Enfield - Smithsonian Collection

            Interesting that it has Palmer bands instead of Baddeley bands, which were introduced on RSAF guns in 1861 (and so, should have been on L.A.Co. guns as well). But perhaps the L.A.Co. did not change over until sometime in 1862. I've seen 1861-dated L.A.Co. P53s with Palmer bands, and 1862-dated L.A.Co. P53s with either Palmer or Baddeley bands. 1863-dated L.A.Co. guns seem to have Baddeley bands (although there are probably exceptions to all of these).

            Geoff Walden

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: 1862 LA Co. Enfield - Smithsonian Collection

              Here are pictures of my 1860 LAC. Geoff I believe I sent you pictures years ago, but if you would like anymore, let me know. Sorry wasn't able to get good light today.
              Quick history of the gun; it is a "Volunteer" weapon I bought in London in the late 90s. Barrel is marked "Blanche & Sons, 29 Gracechurch St, London" It had a sheet medal flash shield, that sadly US customs made me take off and kept, for some unknown reason.
              It had been cleaned during its service, but I took a picture of the bottom of the barrel near the end showing the bluing. Also, notice the nipple protector chain piece, and the escutcheons are round, not square.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0515.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	806.0 KB
ID:	224674

              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0521.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	411.5 KB
ID:	224675

              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0512.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	541.0 KB
ID:	224676

              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0518.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	707.4 KB
ID:	224677

              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0519.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	748.3 KB
ID:	224678

              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0520.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	660.8 KB
ID:	224679
              Virgil Roberts

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: 1862 LA Co. Enfield - Smithsonian Collection

                The issue of if/when LACo exported P53s with Baddeley patent bands is an interesting one. LAC used Baddeley bands to fill their War Dept contracts, as they were specified but there is some debate if they filled other commercial contracts with Baddeley bands, or continued to use existing supplies of Palmer type bands. William O. Adams is one well known Enfield expert and collector (and one with with many LACs) in particular that is of the opinion that LACs with Baddeley bands were not shipped to America during the US Civil War in any appreciable numbers.

                There is at least anecdotal evidence that Baddeley bands were recently found dug at a late war Georgia battlefield (see antique arms website where it is mentioned). Subsequent discussions with Bill Adams led to conceding the possibility that very few P53s contained in the final shipments from LAC *may* have been imported with Baddeley bands in early 1865. I have never found Bill Adams to be incorrect concerning anything factually related to the Civil War-era P53 Enfield, especially where LAC is concerned. At any rate, as far as the barrel bands go, it appears the Palmer type were most commonly encountered on the CS contract arms, not the Baddeley patent bands.

                I have done some research on Baddeley, and there is a chapter on him in the upcoming book Suppliers to the Confederacy: More English Arms and Accoutrements from David Burt and me due out later in 2015. Fascinating individual, literally wrote the book on making gun powder and died of diphtheria in 1861. For more information as well as the citations for most of the above statements, see the article in the archives here on barrel bands: http://www.authentic-campaigner.com/...-Craig-L-Barry

                Lastly, being a LAC machine made P53, it is going to have the round eared lock plate washers, not the commonly encountered commercial type III squared-off variety, regardless of what type barrel bands are on it. The Windsor type II P53s made by Robbins & Lawrence in the 1850s had round eared washers, which is merely a function of how the stock making machinery cuts the mortises for the lock plate screws.
                Last edited by Craig L Barry; 04-24-2015, 02:51 PM.
                Craig L Barry
                Editor, The Watchdog, a non-profit 501[c]3
                Co-author (with David Burt) Suppliers to the Confederacy
                Author, The Civil War Musket: A Handbook for Historical Accuracy
                Member, Company of Military Historians

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: 1862 LA Co. Enfield - Smithsonian Collection

                  Thanks, Virgil, you did indeed send me pics of the gun several years ago.

                  Here is an L.A.Co. P53/3 dated 1862, with Baddeley bands, that Tim Prince identified as a U.S. import gun. I have seen this same marking on several other L.A.Co. P53s. Myself, I don't know if it a British mark or a U.S. inspector's mark. Tim said he couldn't identify the inspector.



                  Naturally, making judgments about extant London Armoury Co. P53s – regardless of barrel band types – is problematic, in the absence of good provenance of use in the Civil War. I’ve only ever seen a handful of L.A.Co. P63s with any genuine Civil War association. I’ve seen many more L.A.Co. P53s that most likely arrived in the States post-1865, and had nothing to do with the Civil War.

                  Geoff Walden

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: 1862 LA Co. Enfield - Smithsonian Collection

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	Baddeley image 1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	199.3 KB
ID:	224701

                    Lt Col John Fraser Luddington Baddeley 1825-1862
                    Craig L Barry
                    Editor, The Watchdog, a non-profit 501[c]3
                    Co-author (with David Burt) Suppliers to the Confederacy
                    Author, The Civil War Musket: A Handbook for Historical Accuracy
                    Member, Company of Military Historians

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: 1862 LA Co. Enfield - Smithsonian Collection

                      To me, the most interesting thing about the barrel bands is that they are on the gun backwards, indicating disassembly and reassembly by someone who did not know better....
                      For what is is worth, the 1862 dated Kerr Rifle I have for sale (LA CO produced) has Baddeley bands and is certainly a commercial gun, not a British government contract gun.
                      Last edited by Tim Prince; 05-28-2015, 05:42 PM. Reason: bad typing
                      [SIZE=1]Your most humble and obedient servant,[/SIZE]
                      [SIZE=2]Tim Prince[/SIZE]
                      [I]Member CWDCA (The Civil War Dealers & Collectors Association)
                      Member CWPT (Civil War Preservation Trust)
                      Member The Company of Military Historians
                      Member SABC (Society of American Bayonet Collectors)
                      Hiram Lodge #7 F&AM
                      [/I][URL=http://www.collegehillarsenal.com]collegehillarsenal.com[/URL]

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: 1862 LA Co. Enfield - Smithsonian Collection

                        Hey Tim,

                        But, don't you see that all the time? :)

                        I gave up trying to advise museum and collection curators to open up the case and put the barrel bands on the right way ... I was wasting my time. Especially NPS sites ... I think someone in the NPS went around years ago and put all the Enfield barrels bands on backwards. :)

                        I just received The Book yesterday ... WOW! It will take me a LONG time to go through all of that. I will just say here, that the photos are amazing!

                        Geoff Walden

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: 1862 LA Co. Enfield - Smithsonian Collection

                          Long range target rifles like Kerrs & Whitworths had Baddeley patent bands. And yes, screw heads facing the wrong way in museums, often see that with the swivels as well.
                          Craig L Barry
                          Editor, The Watchdog, a non-profit 501[c]3
                          Co-author (with David Burt) Suppliers to the Confederacy
                          Author, The Civil War Musket: A Handbook for Historical Accuracy
                          Member, Company of Military Historians

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X