Hello all. I've been researching a local battle, and have been searching for the reports of the officers involved. I have only been able to find two reports, and only one of those was written within a week of the fight, from a Col. Crooks of the 4th Indiana Legion. Crooks was not the overall commander, as Lt. Col. Wood of the 1st Indiana Cavalry was in the area recruiting and took overall command. Wouldn't it make sense that he would have filed some sort of report since he was the overall commander?
Plus, the day before the fight these two were involved in, another skirmish took place that resulted in them crossing the Ohio River with their men in the first place. The colonel of the regiment that was forming there was killed (Gabriel Netter), and command fell to a Major Ira Stout. I can find nothing that is written by Stout explaining anything about either fight. Is this typical, or have I just always been under the wrong impression that officers generally made some sort of report concerning the significant actions they may have been a part of? Any advice or thoughts are appreciated!
Plus, the day before the fight these two were involved in, another skirmish took place that resulted in them crossing the Ohio River with their men in the first place. The colonel of the regiment that was forming there was killed (Gabriel Netter), and command fell to a Major Ira Stout. I can find nothing that is written by Stout explaining anything about either fight. Is this typical, or have I just always been under the wrong impression that officers generally made some sort of report concerning the significant actions they may have been a part of? Any advice or thoughts are appreciated!
Comment