Re: Fife tunes from Bruce and Emmett (and nowhere else?)
I could understand Blatchley having composed tunes attributed to him, such as Blatchley's Banter, but I'm having a hard time believing Hopkins composed that one, and others attributed to other musicians. some of the no namers maybe, like Corn Cob Clog. if so, he writes one hell of a good fife tune!
Do you know what year George Carroll's B&E is? He showed me it once, but I can't remember.
As for the whole "authors copying other authors' plates" thing, are we talking about copying entire pages from other people's manuals, or are you saying they had individual engraved plates of each tune/beat, and later publishers got ahold of these hundreds of little plates and arranged them into new manuals?
I really don't think anyone had a need to "copy" from any manual. Musicians who can read music, especially veterans who played the music all the time for many years, only need a pen and paper to write down the scores of tunes and beats which, except for a fairly small percentage, is basically really easy music. We're not talking Beethoven's 9th here.
As for AVF Three Camps being a "corrected" version of Howe's, if they were copying other manuals, using their plates, why correct it, and how do you correct an engraved plate? Or was it more likely just a different version agreed upon by the compilers from those submitted? Maybe most variations between manuals aren't "mistakes", just different versions different people knew. If Col. Hart for example, made mistakes on some of his duty beats and tunes in his 1862 manual, he certainly could have corrected them in the later two editions of it he put out during the war. He made some changes, but I don't recall he made actual corrections (Sue could fill us in).
Hopefully more research will shine a better light on whether the manuals played a significant role in what Civil War musicians learned or not, or alternatively if they reflected what was being taught by rote in the field.
Joe Whitney
I could understand Blatchley having composed tunes attributed to him, such as Blatchley's Banter, but I'm having a hard time believing Hopkins composed that one, and others attributed to other musicians. some of the no namers maybe, like Corn Cob Clog. if so, he writes one hell of a good fife tune!
Do you know what year George Carroll's B&E is? He showed me it once, but I can't remember.
As for the whole "authors copying other authors' plates" thing, are we talking about copying entire pages from other people's manuals, or are you saying they had individual engraved plates of each tune/beat, and later publishers got ahold of these hundreds of little plates and arranged them into new manuals?
I really don't think anyone had a need to "copy" from any manual. Musicians who can read music, especially veterans who played the music all the time for many years, only need a pen and paper to write down the scores of tunes and beats which, except for a fairly small percentage, is basically really easy music. We're not talking Beethoven's 9th here.
As for AVF Three Camps being a "corrected" version of Howe's, if they were copying other manuals, using their plates, why correct it, and how do you correct an engraved plate? Or was it more likely just a different version agreed upon by the compilers from those submitted? Maybe most variations between manuals aren't "mistakes", just different versions different people knew. If Col. Hart for example, made mistakes on some of his duty beats and tunes in his 1862 manual, he certainly could have corrected them in the later two editions of it he put out during the war. He made some changes, but I don't recall he made actual corrections (Sue could fill us in).
Hopefully more research will shine a better light on whether the manuals played a significant role in what Civil War musicians learned or not, or alternatively if they reflected what was being taught by rote in the field.
Joe Whitney
Comment