If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I'm attaching a photo of the 50th Pennsylvania Infantry on parade in Beaufort SC in January of 1862 my question is because the image is so far away does it appear that they are wearing Frock Coats or Sack Coats?
[CENTER]Yours with a jerk,
Michael Kirby
2009
[COLOR="Green"]Fort Moultrie : STRANGER DANGER!
Sharpsburg LH: Wrecking the Van (The Tripp Corbin Experience)
Westville GA Work Weekend: SWAMP MONSTER![/COLOR]
[COLOR="Blue"]Bummers
[/COLOR]
2010
[COLOR="Blue"]Pt. Lookout Maryland LH
Rivers Bridge Federal Campaigner Adjunct
Backwaters 1865
In The Van: Trailing Kirby Smith
Before The Breakout
Struggles of Secession[/COLOR][/CENTER]
My humble assesment is that they are in fatigue blouses. The bagginess in the arms is the first giveaway, followed by the shortness in length. Another interesting part of the image is the number of dark blue trousers versus sky blue (not all uniform here).
"...and if profanity was included in the course of study at West Point, I am sure that the Army of the Cumberland had their share of the prize scholars in this branch." - B.F. Scribner, 38th Indiana Vol Inf
He has a plethora of Federal images from Beaufort. He also has a mind worth picking.
I have a few names in Beaufort you could get in touch with. Good reenactors. PM me and I'll give you an e-mail address or two.
Galen Wagner
Mobile, AL
Duty is, then, the sublimest word in our language.Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more. You should never wish to do less. -Col. Robert E.Lee, Superintendent of USMA West Point, 1852
They're all wearing sack coats, and their rifles all have angular bayonets. There's a few guys with dark blue trousers but not many, and the majority of rifles have patch boxes. They're in full marching order and a few overcoats can be seen packed on top of the knapsacks; some apparently don't have overcoats.
Brian White
[URL="http://wwandcompany.com"]Wambaugh, White, & Co.[/URL]
[URL="https://www.facebook.com/pages/Wambaugh-White-Company/114587141930517"]https://www.facebook.com/pages/Wambaugh-White-Company/114587141930517[/URL]
[email]brian@wwandcompany.com[/email]
The problem with the image is that the length of time for the exposure saw a number of men fidgeting, moving, or looking at the camera (which distorts some of the M1855 bayonets).
Some of the guns are late Model 1855 rifle-muskets.
Here is a test of my feeble PC skills,, let's see if I can post an image. (The jpg version falls apart too much at 200%):
The 12th man from the viewers left appears to have his blouse tucked in his trousers. And the 7th lad appears to have his cap box front and center.
Curt
Last edited by Curt Schmidt; 04-29-2009, 11:26 AM.
Curt Schmidt
In gleichem Schritt und Tritt, Curt Schmidt
-Hard and sharp as flint...secret, and self-contained, and solitary as an oyster.
-Haplogroup R1b M343 (Subclade R1b1a2 M269)
-Pointless Folksy Wisdom Mess, Oblio Lodge #1
-Vastly Ignorant
-Often incorrect, technically, historically, factually.
Originally posted by Curt-Heinrich SchmidtView Post
Hallo!
The problem with the image is that the length of time for the exposure saw a number of men fidgeting, moving, or looking at the camera (which distorts some of the M1855 bayonets).
Some of the guns are late Model 1855 rifle-muskets.
Here is a test of my feeble PC skills,, let's see if I can post an image. (The jpg version falls apart too much at 200%):
The 12th man from the viewers left appears to have his blouse tucked in his trousers. And the 7th lad appears to have his cap box front and center.
Curt
AHHH there ya go!! Pictures answer so many questions when you are able to see everything somewhat better, It looked like some of them are possibly carrying some 1841 Remington alteration muskets that was why I was thinking sabre bayonets. But I guess they are the 1855's....The hammer on the musket second soldier from left looked like it could be the 1841...Curt what do you think.
Last edited by PetePaolillo; 04-29-2009, 12:34 PM.
Originally posted by Curt-Heinrich SchmidtView Post
Hallo!
The problem with the image is that the length of time for the exposure saw a number of men fidgeting, moving, or looking at the camera (which distorts some of the M1855 bayonets).
Some of the guns are late Model 1855 rifle-muskets.
Here is a test of my feeble PC skills,, let's see if I can post an image. (The jpg version falls apart too much at 200%):
The 12th man from the viewers left appears to have his blouse tucked in his trousers. And the 7th lad appears to have his cap box front and center.
Curt
AWESOME! I can not thank you enough for enlarging that photo for me, my computer doesnt have the program to get it like that and I thank you.
[CENTER]Yours with a jerk,
Michael Kirby
2009
[COLOR="Green"]Fort Moultrie : STRANGER DANGER!
Sharpsburg LH: Wrecking the Van (The Tripp Corbin Experience)
Westville GA Work Weekend: SWAMP MONSTER![/COLOR]
[COLOR="Blue"]Bummers
[/COLOR]
2010
[COLOR="Blue"]Pt. Lookout Maryland LH
Rivers Bridge Federal Campaigner Adjunct
Backwaters 1865
In The Van: Trailing Kirby Smith
Before The Breakout
Struggles of Secession[/COLOR][/CENTER]
Light reflection and refraction, coupled with movement plays h*ll with trying to see detail.
Easier one.. I "see" no M1841's. They all appear to rifle-musket or musket length, plus the "patchbox" on an M1841 is longer than that on an M1855.
Harder one...
I think I "see" several (without counting) M1822 alteration or M1842's based upon the flat buttplate, comb style, and the double loop nosecap/front band (one seen in the first muzzle visible on the viewer's left, and on the 7th man).
At first I thought that the mix of rifle-muskets and muskets might be explained by the 50th PVI perhaps still being one of those musket armed with the two flank (skirmish) companies being RM armed- but the apparent mixing is off.
Others' mileage will vary...
Curt
Curt Schmidt
In gleichem Schritt und Tritt, Curt Schmidt
-Hard and sharp as flint...secret, and self-contained, and solitary as an oyster.
-Haplogroup R1b M343 (Subclade R1b1a2 M269)
-Pointless Folksy Wisdom Mess, Oblio Lodge #1
-Vastly Ignorant
-Often incorrect, technically, historically, factually.
Another thing that is note worthy, note the lack of breast plates on the cartridge box straps. And the lack of a cartridge box strap at all on the first man.
[CENTER]Yours with a jerk,
Michael Kirby
2009
[COLOR="Green"]Fort Moultrie : STRANGER DANGER!
Sharpsburg LH: Wrecking the Van (The Tripp Corbin Experience)
Westville GA Work Weekend: SWAMP MONSTER![/COLOR]
[COLOR="Blue"]Bummers
[/COLOR]
2010
[COLOR="Blue"]Pt. Lookout Maryland LH
Rivers Bridge Federal Campaigner Adjunct
Backwaters 1865
In The Van: Trailing Kirby Smith
Before The Breakout
Struggles of Secession[/COLOR][/CENTER]
Originally posted by Curt-Heinrich SchmidtView Post
Hallo!
Light reflection and refraction, coupled with movement plays h*ll with trying to see detail.
Easier one.. I "see" no M1841's. They all appear to rifle-musket or musket length, plus the "patchbox" on an M1841 is longer than that on an M1855.
Harder one...
I think I "see" several (without counting) M1822 alteration or M1842's based upon the flat buttplate, comb style, and the double loop nosecap/front band (one seen in the first muzzle visible on the viewer's left, and on the 7th man).
At first I thought that the mix of rifle-muskets and muskets might be explained by the 50th PVI perhaps still being one of those musket armed with the two flank (skirmish) companies being RM armed- but the apparent mixing is off.
Others' mileage will vary...
Curt
Curt, Right on! Thanks..It is a great photo...lots of stuff to chew on.
You may notice also that their trouser are all not rolled up on parade. You can tell they were as they are way to long and very wrinkled. Great pic, early war indeed. I always wonder how guys screw up a Union impression with pics like this.
Thomas J. Alleman
"If the choice be mine, I chose to march." LOR
Comment