I recently was perusing a bunch of colorized images. I began to notice something I hadn't noticed before and that was officers wearing their sword belts (and sword) under their coat (with the coat open). I first noticed it in this photo on the gentlemen on the far right.
Then I was able to quickly find it again here with these 4 cavalry officers are all wearing their belt in the same manner.
Then there is this image of 4 generals with two wearing the belt in this manner.
Here again, 2 more with their belts under their coats (circled by me in red) and you can see the swords coming from beneath their coat tails.
Having not noticed this before I now am questioning "why are they wearing their sword and belt in such a manner". After a brief search, I am not finding textual references to this, but thought I would put it out here. Has anyone encountered this in their research?
I would suppose that it could be warm and the coat is being worn open as a means of temperature regulation causing the sword and belt to be worn underneath the coat. At first I thought that it was a practical and definitely casual method of dress, but then seeing the general and field officer with Lincoln dressed in the same manner, I hesitate to dismiss this as a causal or practical state of undress.
Humbly,
Nathan
Then I was able to quickly find it again here with these 4 cavalry officers are all wearing their belt in the same manner.
Then there is this image of 4 generals with two wearing the belt in this manner.
Here again, 2 more with their belts under their coats (circled by me in red) and you can see the swords coming from beneath their coat tails.
Having not noticed this before I now am questioning "why are they wearing their sword and belt in such a manner". After a brief search, I am not finding textual references to this, but thought I would put it out here. Has anyone encountered this in their research?
I would suppose that it could be warm and the coat is being worn open as a means of temperature regulation causing the sword and belt to be worn underneath the coat. At first I thought that it was a practical and definitely casual method of dress, but then seeing the general and field officer with Lincoln dressed in the same manner, I hesitate to dismiss this as a causal or practical state of undress.
Humbly,
Nathan
Comment