Halo Kameraden,
I am recreating an M 1855 knapsack after an original, which is in very bad condition.
I have seen the pictures of this item in EOG, and in other Publications. The Original we (Jan Berger and I) choose has a semi glossy finish, but on most of the other knapsack pictures i had seen, the surface was very glossy. Now my question: Are all Knapsacks High Glossy, or are there different grades of glossy? ( I think so, because the fabrication of the high glossy surface was to expensive, because it needs a lot of time to dry.) in the old columbia rifles compendium was written, that there was a "varnishing " on the sack for waterproofing, but i made oilcloth before (only the paint, no varnishing) and it was a very good waterproofing . Are there known more "little glossy" knapsacks, or is this a reason of the "Teeth of Time" . I am looking for original pictures from soldiers with knapsacks.
Thank you for help
I am recreating an M 1855 knapsack after an original, which is in very bad condition.
I have seen the pictures of this item in EOG, and in other Publications. The Original we (Jan Berger and I) choose has a semi glossy finish, but on most of the other knapsack pictures i had seen, the surface was very glossy. Now my question: Are all Knapsacks High Glossy, or are there different grades of glossy? ( I think so, because the fabrication of the high glossy surface was to expensive, because it needs a lot of time to dry.) in the old columbia rifles compendium was written, that there was a "varnishing " on the sack for waterproofing, but i made oilcloth before (only the paint, no varnishing) and it was a very good waterproofing . Are there known more "little glossy" knapsacks, or is this a reason of the "Teeth of Time" . I am looking for original pictures from soldiers with knapsacks.
Thank you for help
Comment