Re: wearing US buckles upside down
I think the conclusion that we can draw is that we know that at times some CS troops used captured and/or reissued US gear. There are period photos that suggest that of these men - some of them, at some point, wore a US belt inverted. I think that the disputed issue is not did it happen, but rather why and to what extent. Unless a hitherto unknown primary document emerges saying "today I received a captured US belt, and I decided to wear it upside down because..." - I think that we are simply speculating. In my opinion, I think the whole SN story that gets repeated to the public (and at museums no less) is a bunch of hooey - that isn't to say that some CS troops didn't wear inverted US belts. Then again, I say some. The next question is how common was this practice? Is it something that is screaming for representation in the living history world?
I think the conclusion that we can draw is that we know that at times some CS troops used captured and/or reissued US gear. There are period photos that suggest that of these men - some of them, at some point, wore a US belt inverted. I think that the disputed issue is not did it happen, but rather why and to what extent. Unless a hitherto unknown primary document emerges saying "today I received a captured US belt, and I decided to wear it upside down because..." - I think that we are simply speculating. In my opinion, I think the whole SN story that gets repeated to the public (and at museums no less) is a bunch of hooey - that isn't to say that some CS troops didn't wear inverted US belts. Then again, I say some. The next question is how common was this practice? Is it something that is screaming for representation in the living history world?
Comment