I alluded to this on the rope halter thread, but wanted to throw it out there for you guys to ponder. Especially in keeping with Ken's opinion on "less is more". Several years ago Darryl Robertson (who lives in the area), met a guy who had done extensive relic hunting on various sites related to the Red River campaign. If memory serves, this guy had put together a sort of private museum to hold all the different relics he'd accumulated over the years. Anyway, this guy was talking to Darryl about a Confederate cavalry site he'd hunted. I believe it was documented to Tom Green's brigade of mostly Texas cavalry.
Anyway, the guy showed Darryl the collection of cavalry picket pins he'd found still staked in the ground in orderly rows. What was surprising was that he found quite a few socket bayonets placed in the ground in those same rows as well. The relic hunter had no real explanation for the phenomenon. As a side note, I believe the research leading to this find was that Green's cavalry had been surpised in this location by Federals and had left very hastily, which is why the relic hunter was detecting there in the first place.
However, considering that 3 band enfields and Infantry accoutrements were issued to the Trans-Mississippi cavalry prior to that campaign, would it be safe to assume that bayonets were also issued as part of the larger package? If so, can we also theorize that enterprising cavalrymen realized early on that these bayonets could be pressed into service as picket pins? To me, it would make perfect sense.
I've long thought that the picket pin is under represented in the hobby and was much more prevelant as the most common way of campaigning with horses than the more commonly seen picket rope.
Anyway, the guy showed Darryl the collection of cavalry picket pins he'd found still staked in the ground in orderly rows. What was surprising was that he found quite a few socket bayonets placed in the ground in those same rows as well. The relic hunter had no real explanation for the phenomenon. As a side note, I believe the research leading to this find was that Green's cavalry had been surpised in this location by Federals and had left very hastily, which is why the relic hunter was detecting there in the first place.
However, considering that 3 band enfields and Infantry accoutrements were issued to the Trans-Mississippi cavalry prior to that campaign, would it be safe to assume that bayonets were also issued as part of the larger package? If so, can we also theorize that enterprising cavalrymen realized early on that these bayonets could be pressed into service as picket pins? To me, it would make perfect sense.
I've long thought that the picket pin is under represented in the hobby and was much more prevelant as the most common way of campaigning with horses than the more commonly seen picket rope.
Comment