Re: ANNOUNCING: The 2011 Cavalry Camp of Instruction!!!....
Unfortunately modern military commitments and a family situation kept me from being able to attend. By all accounts, the event was as good as I expected from the organizers. I sure wish I could have made it. I have seen some of the photos of the event and read most of the comments here and I'd like to offer a suggestion as someone on the outside looking in. First of all, the premise of the CoI is excellent and from all accounts, the organization and coursework are perfect. I think the overall goal is to get people to make positive changes in their impressions. Not just in appearance, but in attitude, campaigning, etc. I also agree that if we are able to change just one person for the better, then the event was worthwhile. However, anyone who attends such an event should be willing to take the criticism and listen to the suggestions on how to improve your impression.
No one really cares for excuses. I can't speak for other units, but for us what you have in your kit is either right or it's wrong. The old core group of the Buttermilk Rangers have been riding together now for almost 20 years and we STILL have an authenticity inspection in the parking lot of the events we attend. And we're one of those units that take great pride in hand-stitching, good hats, etc., but it's still easy for us to get lazy and start worrying more about our own personal comfort over authenticity. Barry, I don't know you and I wasn't there, so I certainly won't pass judgement. But when someone pointed out your farby sweatshirt, you had an excuse (albeit a very good one). Those guys had health issues as well. There ARE ways to overcome and adapt to the situation and still be historically correct. Taking your marbles and going home isn't the solution. I'm sure everyone was sympathetic to your reasons for doing something historically inaccurate, but it doesn't change the fact.
To the event organizers, why not conduct an authenticity inspection at the beginning of the event? I'm sure Mike and Guy will remember when the WIG had us all do one at Raymond II many years ago. Just lay everything out on a blanket and let the staff pick it apart. Ask the guys with farby items like stampede strings or bandanas or whatever to remove them and explain why. Help them make the corrections that can be made on the spot with good constructive criticism. Rolling a hat brim up or changing the shape of a kepi can be done quickly and effortlessly. It's usually about what you need to take off rather than put on.
I guess my real question to those with obviously inaccurate impressions (and it goes beyond material culture... I think I even saw a pony tail on a guy in one pic), what was the reason for attending this type of event if it wasn't for self-improvement? I can tell you now that I'm constantly working to improve my impression, including my current diet, and I'm far from new to the hobby. If I can admit that I'm a farb in some areas, anyone can. The key is to not accept our shortcomings, but work to improve them.
Just my observations from the outside looking in.
Unfortunately modern military commitments and a family situation kept me from being able to attend. By all accounts, the event was as good as I expected from the organizers. I sure wish I could have made it. I have seen some of the photos of the event and read most of the comments here and I'd like to offer a suggestion as someone on the outside looking in. First of all, the premise of the CoI is excellent and from all accounts, the organization and coursework are perfect. I think the overall goal is to get people to make positive changes in their impressions. Not just in appearance, but in attitude, campaigning, etc. I also agree that if we are able to change just one person for the better, then the event was worthwhile. However, anyone who attends such an event should be willing to take the criticism and listen to the suggestions on how to improve your impression.
No one really cares for excuses. I can't speak for other units, but for us what you have in your kit is either right or it's wrong. The old core group of the Buttermilk Rangers have been riding together now for almost 20 years and we STILL have an authenticity inspection in the parking lot of the events we attend. And we're one of those units that take great pride in hand-stitching, good hats, etc., but it's still easy for us to get lazy and start worrying more about our own personal comfort over authenticity. Barry, I don't know you and I wasn't there, so I certainly won't pass judgement. But when someone pointed out your farby sweatshirt, you had an excuse (albeit a very good one). Those guys had health issues as well. There ARE ways to overcome and adapt to the situation and still be historically correct. Taking your marbles and going home isn't the solution. I'm sure everyone was sympathetic to your reasons for doing something historically inaccurate, but it doesn't change the fact.
To the event organizers, why not conduct an authenticity inspection at the beginning of the event? I'm sure Mike and Guy will remember when the WIG had us all do one at Raymond II many years ago. Just lay everything out on a blanket and let the staff pick it apart. Ask the guys with farby items like stampede strings or bandanas or whatever to remove them and explain why. Help them make the corrections that can be made on the spot with good constructive criticism. Rolling a hat brim up or changing the shape of a kepi can be done quickly and effortlessly. It's usually about what you need to take off rather than put on.
I guess my real question to those with obviously inaccurate impressions (and it goes beyond material culture... I think I even saw a pony tail on a guy in one pic), what was the reason for attending this type of event if it wasn't for self-improvement? I can tell you now that I'm constantly working to improve my impression, including my current diet, and I'm far from new to the hobby. If I can admit that I'm a farb in some areas, anyone can. The key is to not accept our shortcomings, but work to improve them.
Just my observations from the outside looking in.
Comment