I have a question for those of you more experienced than I. I have seen the debates on horse colors and types rage on this and other boards. I have a buckskin quarter horse that I have used for hunting. He is calm, unfazed by crowds, smoke and gunfire. I was considering using him for reenacting. I know that the color-type was defined much later then the mid 19th century. I have seen photos of light colored horses as well as far more of the dark colors. My question is how far off am I to use him?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Buckskins?
Collapse
X
-
Re: Buckskins?
Barry,
I used the horse and wouldn't worry about the color issue. The important thing is to take it slow and get the horse use to the sights and sounds of a reenactment event. I've got a chestnut colored mare and she fits in fine. I know most people say only use a gelding but I truly believe it depends on the individual disposition of the horse as to whether or not they will be a good mount for a event. The proper saddle and equipment is also important. If the horse is comfortable with what you put on it's back it will tend to be a more "happy" horse. Put your horse next to a seasoned veteran and it will most likely take the lead from the veteran and stay calm. Being a herding animal they all need a "buddy."
I wish you great success with your new mount.
Safety First,
Mark White
16th MO Mounted Infantry[FONT=Century Gothic]Mark C. White[/FONT]
-
Re: Buckskins?
Originally posted by Barry SmithsonI have a buckskin quarter horse that I have used for hunting. He is calm, unfazed by crowds, smoke and gunfire. My question is how far off am I to use him?
You can go to my webpages to get some ideas on how to train him to be a good cavalry mount if you like.Linneus Ahearn
[URL=http://9thvirginia.com]9th Virginia Cavalry[/URL]
Comment
-
Re: Buckskins?
Stonewall Jackson's mount "Little Sorrel" was described by one contemporary observer as a "dun of very sorry appearance." From my readings dun appeared to be a color that was more common in non-TB horses at that time. I would argue that this color was rare in horses originating in the Northeast and Canada, due to the original base stock of these horses, but became more common as one traveled South and West. Common local stock, with probable old Spanish influence, would be more likely to have this color. "Poor men's" horses in the South, for example marsh tackies, cracker horses, Creole horses, and Chickasaws, would be more likely to be of this color since they all have Spanish influence. It was found in the Mexican mustangs of Texas as well as half-bred "Texas horses" (TB/Mexican cross). First hand Civil War accounts also discuss gray and roan horses, so these would be fine too.
The only color I would say is inaccurate for battlefield use is a spotted horse. There is substantial period literature arguing that such horses were less hardy. There was a strong military prejudice against them on the basis of appearance too. In the East they were considered fit for circuses, pulling advertising wagons, and the like. If they were ever used it would most likely be in the western theater where they had access to Mexican mustangs. (I think I recall seeing one mention of Kilpatrick riding a "spotted horse" but unfortunately can't remember now where I saw it.) Still, it would a rarity on a par with jaguar-skin trowsers as far as I can tell.
Of course, many reenactors use horse types and breeds that were rare or nonexistent in the US at that time. Color is only one issue although of course, the most easily recognizable. Unfortunately, many of the old breeds and bloodlines are extinct or nearly so, and among those breeds that have survived appearance has often changed a great deal.
Ken Morris
Comment
-
Re: Buckskins?
Ken,
This may help a tad with the Spotted Horse story you recalled:
Confederate Veteran Magazine mentions:
As long as Little Sorrel hung around as a stuffed display, I'd guess a color photo wouldn't be too awful hard to locate. (Famous last words!)
Charles Heath[B]Charles Heath[/B]
[EMAIL="heath9999@aol.com"]heath9999@aol.com[/EMAIL]
[URL="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Spanglers_Spring_Living_History/"]12 - 14 Jun 09 Hoosiers at Gettysburg[/URL]
[EMAIL="heath9999@aol.com"]17-19 Jul 09 Mumford/GCV Carpe Eventum [/EMAIL]
[EMAIL="beatlefans1@verizon.net"]31 Jul - 2 Aug 09 Texans at Gettysburg [/EMAIL]
[EMAIL="JDO@npmhu.org"] 11-13 Sep 09 Fortress Monroe [/EMAIL]
[URL="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Elmira_Death_March/?yguid=25647636"]2-4 Oct 09 Death March XI - Corduroy[/URL]
[EMAIL="oldsoldier51@yahoo.com"] G'burg Memorial March [/EMAIL]
Comment
-
Little Sorrel, probably just a sorrel
Back before they buried Little Sorrel's last remains I took a look at him but they didn't allow photos. Judging his coat by what I know of the dun factor I don't recall any line down his back or any difference in his mane and tail color. He seemed just a faded with age sorrel or chestnut. Here is a look at him after the war (obvously a black and white photo)
Linneus Ahearn
[URL=http://9thvirginia.com]9th Virginia Cavalry[/URL]
Comment
-
Re: Buckskins?
Thanks, I knew I'd seen it somewhere! Too bad the horse was not described. He may have been leopard-spotted, otherwise he probably would have been called piebald, skewbald or even "calico." Some leopard-spotted horses were imported from Germany in the 1850s. But there's no way of knowing without a better description.
As for Little Sorrel, I have seen a color photo of him. He looked like a faded pale chestnut in the photo. Problem with old taxidermied animals is that they can fade a lot and not look much like the original color. If he had a line or "list" down his back he was a red dun; if not he was just plain ol' sorrel. I couldn't tell from looking at the photo. I believe he was also described by contemporaries as a light sorrel rather than as a dun. However a saddle and crupper would have hidden the list.
Ken Morris
Originally posted by Charles HeathKen,
This may help a tad with the Spotted Horse story you recalled:
Confederate Veteran Magazine mentions:
As long as Little Sorrel hung around as a stuffed display, I'd guess a color photo wouldn't be too awful hard to locate. (Famous last words!)
Charles Heath
Comment
-
Re: Buckskins?
Ken,
As you sift through this, note the differences is color between the two color shots of Little Sorrel. In 1911, a great 1863 photograph of Little Sorrel aka Fancy aka Bob was printed in the Cavalry volume of the Photographic History of the Civil War. It is probably in the more recent editions, too. His coat is shining, and he shows good form for his supposed Morgan breeding. That photo doesn't seem to show up on the 'net, and neither do the great views of the horses from Grierson's Raid. The latter of which had a heck of a lot of color variations in their mounts. More on that at another time.
Little Sorrel when alive:
Well fed Little Sorrel:
Same image as a small card currently for sale:
Color Photo about 2/3 way down on the right.
From the Smithsonian page:
"Little Sorrel, or "Fancy" as he was known, became famous as the mount of General Stonewall Jackson. Captured at Harpers Ferry by the Confederates, he was chosen initially for Mrs. Jackson but eventually commandeered by the General when his own horse, Big Sorrel, proved unreliable in battle.
In 1863, at Chancellorsville, Jackson, while riding the horse, was wounded by his own men and died a few days later. At first Little Sorrel was pastured at Mrs. Jackson's home in North Carolina, later sent as a mascot to the Virginia Military Institute where the General had taught cadets he led to battle, and then in response to requests from many Southern States, was shown at fairs and exhibitions.
In 1885, ancient and infirm at the age of 35, he was retired to the Confederate Soldier's Home. The following year he died when the hoist used to lift him to his feet slipped; he fell breaking his back. Little Sorrel was stuffed and housed in a museum at the Veterans Home until 1949 when he was finally returned to V.M.I."
Now, what color is this horse (another view) (about 1/2 way down the page) :sarcastic :
The 1997 burial:
--------------------------------------------------------
Charles Heath[B]Charles Heath[/B]
[EMAIL="heath9999@aol.com"]heath9999@aol.com[/EMAIL]
[URL="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Spanglers_Spring_Living_History/"]12 - 14 Jun 09 Hoosiers at Gettysburg[/URL]
[EMAIL="heath9999@aol.com"]17-19 Jul 09 Mumford/GCV Carpe Eventum [/EMAIL]
[EMAIL="beatlefans1@verizon.net"]31 Jul - 2 Aug 09 Texans at Gettysburg [/EMAIL]
[EMAIL="JDO@npmhu.org"] 11-13 Sep 09 Fortress Monroe [/EMAIL]
[URL="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Elmira_Death_March/?yguid=25647636"]2-4 Oct 09 Death March XI - Corduroy[/URL]
[EMAIL="oldsoldier51@yahoo.com"] G'burg Memorial March [/EMAIL]
Comment
-
Re: Buckskins?
Here's a fun article about Little Sorrell by someone who actually knew him:
[The passage about Little Sorrell begins about 2/3 of the way down the page.]
Sounds like he was an extremely intelligent horse. I also was amused by his habit of lying down like a dog whenever the troops would stop to rest. He also from this account, was an expert forager. It's not surprising Little Sorrell lived so long--he really knew how to take care of himself.
Now that Little Sorrell is a historical icon various breed groups are trying to claim him as "theirs." The Morgan people say he is a Morgan, the Saddlebred people say he was a Saddlebred. There is no evidence that either is true. Little Sorrell looks like neither a Morgan or a Saddlebred. The fact that he paced or ambled argues against him being a Morgan. The Morgans at that time were noted as trotters. The ambling trait does occur in the breed occasionally but it is rare. Pacing horses in the North generally came from Canada (the Canadian Pacer) and some of these pacers were also imported into the South. Most of the gaited breeds developed in the middle South have some Canadian Pacer in their background. (The Pacer itself was said to have arisen from a mix of the Narragansett Pacer and the Canadian Horse. However, there were several families of pacers in Canada that looked very different, so the truth may be much more complicated than this.) Little Sorrell's conformation actually resembles the Hal family of Canadian Pacers more than a Morgan or Saddlebred--high withers, straight back, straight rather than crested neck, and rather short, sloping croup. The Canadian Pacer is now extinct, but one of its predecessors--the Canadian horse--still survives, and the blood of the Canadian Pacer still runs, albeit much diluted, in the Standardbred, the Tennessee Walker, and other American gaited breeds. (The South also had indigenous families of gaited horses, probably of Spanish extraction, most of which are extinct today. The Florida Cracker horse is one example of this type which still survives in small numbers.)
Ken Morris
Comment
-
Re: Buckskins?
Originally posted by Charles HeathKen,
That photo doesn't seem to show up on the 'net, and neither do the great views of the horses from Grierson's Raid. The latter of which had a heck of a lot of color variations in their mounts. More on that at another time.
--------------------------------------------------------
Charles Heath[B][FONT="Book Antiqua"][SIZE="4"][I]Zack Ziarnek[/I][/SIZE][/FONT][/B]
[email]ill6thcav@yahoo.com[/email]
Authentic Campaigner since 1998... Go Hard or Go Home!
"Look back at our struggle for Freedom, Trace our present day's strength to its source, And you'll find that this country's pathway to glory, Is strewn with the bones of the horse." Anonymous
Comment
-
Re: Buckskins?
HTML Code:That photo doesn't seem to show up on the 'net, and neither do the great views of the horses from Grierson's Raid. The latter of which had a heck of a lot of color variations in their mounts. More on that at another time.
I'm glad you mentioned the A. J. Lytle photos of Grierson's men somewhere near Greenwell Springs outside of Baton Rouge. They're some of my favorites of the war. The amount of color variation is amazing and interesting to boot. Obviously, if we are to base so many arguments on period photos, then the color variations of Grierson's mounts open up much food for thought.
Here is another little tid-bit of information I ran across one day while I was doing some research at Southeastern Louisiana University. The university has several out of print books on various Louisiana battles, one of which dealt with Grierson and his actions AFTER the famous raid while still in SE LA. During Grierson's push against Frank Powers' Confederate Cavalry at Clinton, to relieve the pressure on Port Hudson, an observer noted that one of Grierson's Lieutants was mounted on a splendid "spotted horse".
I've always been inclined to go with the flow and just make the argument that spotted horses were practically non-existant during the CW. Now, I'm not so sure...
While that may indeed be the case east of the Appalachians, was it that way here in the west? Better yet, what was it like in the TMD?
Here's a good question... does anyone have a copy of the photo of the Federal trooper mounted on what appears to be an Appaloosa riding a horned Texas saddle? I believe he may have been in a Kansas unit? I'd like to see that one again.
And, since it looks like I'm writing a novel here anyway, has anyone looked closely at the photo of Federal cavalry mounts tied in a row somewhere in Virginia during the mid part of the war, facing the camera (I saw the pic recently in one of those new composite "photographic history of the war" type coffee table books at Barnes & Nobles). The interesting thing in the photo is that several of the horses have what appears to be rifle stocks sticking up from their sides as if the rifles were in old west type saddle scabbards. There are no troopers near the mounts.
What's up with that?
Larry Morgan
Buttermilk Rangers LHCLarry Morgan
Buttermilk Rangers
Comment
-
Re: Buckskins?
Larry,
Hey if someone comes forward with the image of the spotted horse, let me know I'd like to see it too... I can't say I've ever seen that one. Also do you have a jpeg of Lytle's Grierson images? If you do could you send them my way? I've started a folder on every ID'ed 6th and 7th ILL image.
Thanks, Zack Zairnek[B][FONT="Book Antiqua"][SIZE="4"][I]Zack Ziarnek[/I][/SIZE][/FONT][/B]
[email]ill6thcav@yahoo.com[/email]
Authentic Campaigner since 1998... Go Hard or Go Home!
"Look back at our struggle for Freedom, Trace our present day's strength to its source, And you'll find that this country's pathway to glory, Is strewn with the bones of the horse." Anonymous
Comment
-
Re: Buckskins?
Zack,
I wish I did have a jpeg of the Lytle pics. They're some of my favorites. One of these days I'll have to try and dig them up and scan them. Ottis Arnold did have a copy of the mounted Federal with the spotted horse. I'll have to ask him if it's still around somewhere. The horse wasn't a dalmation and it certainly wasn't a paint, but it did have enough white on the hips to classify as an App in my book.
Larry Morgan
Buttermilk Rangers LHCLarry Morgan
Buttermilk Rangers
Comment
-
Re: Buckskins?
Crittermilks on the loose,
If you can lay your hands on one of the older, large format, 1911 or 1957 editions of The Photographic History of the Civil War In Ten Volumes, Part Four: The Cavalry, then you'll have the photos, or at least some of them. These books have been reprinted in smaller format in recent years. Some of the captions for common "been-in-every-book" photos are found nowhere else. Usually a couple over on eBay for under $10. A couple of CS cav photos in there that don't show up in the more modern sources, although one really looks federal, IMHO. I'd love to be able to see a sharper image of the '61 shot of three mounted rebs in Falls Church just outside DC.
I'd like to see that photo of the leopard spotted Appy, too, but I'll settle for the John Munson photo from Wilder's Brigade.
Zack, the broader images of a hundred or more horses of Grierson's boys are on pages 130 and 131. These are the Baton Rouge photos with the men unsaddling their horses in almost a stereo image, but not quite. It also shows -- gasp -- tentage.
Charles Heath[B]Charles Heath[/B]
[EMAIL="heath9999@aol.com"]heath9999@aol.com[/EMAIL]
[URL="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Spanglers_Spring_Living_History/"]12 - 14 Jun 09 Hoosiers at Gettysburg[/URL]
[EMAIL="heath9999@aol.com"]17-19 Jul 09 Mumford/GCV Carpe Eventum [/EMAIL]
[EMAIL="beatlefans1@verizon.net"]31 Jul - 2 Aug 09 Texans at Gettysburg [/EMAIL]
[EMAIL="JDO@npmhu.org"] 11-13 Sep 09 Fortress Monroe [/EMAIL]
[URL="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Elmira_Death_March/?yguid=25647636"]2-4 Oct 09 Death March XI - Corduroy[/URL]
[EMAIL="oldsoldier51@yahoo.com"] G'burg Memorial March [/EMAIL]
Comment
-
Re: Buckskins?
Originally posted by Charles HeathCrittermilks on the loose,
I'd like to see that photo of the leopard spotted Appy, too, but I'll settle for the John Munson photo from Wilder's Brigade.
These are the Baton Rouge photos with the men unsaddling their horses in almost a stereo image, but not quite. It also shows -- gasp -- tentage.
Charles Heath[B][FONT="Book Antiqua"][SIZE="4"][I]Zack Ziarnek[/I][/SIZE][/FONT][/B]
[email]ill6thcav@yahoo.com[/email]
Authentic Campaigner since 1998... Go Hard or Go Home!
"Look back at our struggle for Freedom, Trace our present day's strength to its source, And you'll find that this country's pathway to glory, Is strewn with the bones of the horse." Anonymous
Comment
Comment