Re: Henry Repeater
Hallo!
"Any way you look at it, reenactments seem to have WAY too many Henry's."
Mr. Schmidt,
Yours is an interesting comment, I've yet to see a Henry at any CA event I've attended, maybe folks hide 'em.
Ah, but it was not my comment... ;)
I would point out:
"Basically, this means, on average, that for every 1 Henry at an event, there should be 42 Spencers, 32 Burnsides, 2 Halls, 6 Joslyns, 8 Merrills, 15 Maynards, 50 Sharps and 2 Warners. Any way you look at it, reenactments seem to have WAY too many Henry's."
while an interesting mathematical "tally," IMHO, I would not say "there should be" X number of any particular type of carbine present . Historical units were armed with what units were armed with at any given place and time. And if one's impression or recreated unit was armed with a particular "make" of weapon then the numbers of other arms overall will not be an indicator of that unit's arms.
;)
No Smith carbine armed units? :-)
Curt
Hallo!
"Any way you look at it, reenactments seem to have WAY too many Henry's."
Mr. Schmidt,
Yours is an interesting comment, I've yet to see a Henry at any CA event I've attended, maybe folks hide 'em.
Ah, but it was not my comment... ;)
I would point out:
"Basically, this means, on average, that for every 1 Henry at an event, there should be 42 Spencers, 32 Burnsides, 2 Halls, 6 Joslyns, 8 Merrills, 15 Maynards, 50 Sharps and 2 Warners. Any way you look at it, reenactments seem to have WAY too many Henry's."
while an interesting mathematical "tally," IMHO, I would not say "there should be" X number of any particular type of carbine present . Historical units were armed with what units were armed with at any given place and time. And if one's impression or recreated unit was armed with a particular "make" of weapon then the numbers of other arms overall will not be an indicator of that unit's arms.
;)
No Smith carbine armed units? :-)
Curt
Comment