Re: Recon III Feedback
Mr. watson,
I do not blame the organizers at all. That was the first Recon event I attended, or visited. Chris Anders was very welcoming and I'm glad I got a chance to meet a few folks. I suppose I'm just a stickler when it comes to gear. I don't have the best impression by any means. But, some of the construction of garments and some of the garments themselves were just a little wacky. I saw good impressions, no terrible, but some that I was skeptical about. I do not claim to be an authority, but a few items stuck out as being off the path. One example, jackets. Jackets were to follow Richmond type 2 or 3 patterns. I spotted quite a few that were of improper material or simply didn't follow Richmond patterns. I do not wish to pick apart this piece by piece and do not wish to grant open season on myself. Please understand, this was just my opinion and I am not trying to be an unfair a--hole.
Originally posted by billwatson
I do not blame the organizers at all. That was the first Recon event I attended, or visited. Chris Anders was very welcoming and I'm glad I got a chance to meet a few folks. I suppose I'm just a stickler when it comes to gear. I don't have the best impression by any means. But, some of the construction of garments and some of the garments themselves were just a little wacky. I saw good impressions, no terrible, but some that I was skeptical about. I do not claim to be an authority, but a few items stuck out as being off the path. One example, jackets. Jackets were to follow Richmond type 2 or 3 patterns. I spotted quite a few that were of improper material or simply didn't follow Richmond patterns. I do not wish to pick apart this piece by piece and do not wish to grant open season on myself. Please understand, this was just my opinion and I am not trying to be an unfair a--hole.
Comment