If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The domet flannel issue shirts were all one color, white. The contract variant issue shirts ranged in several different flannel colors from blue, red, gray and brown/tan.
Lewis M Robinson Jr Armory Guards Snake Nation Disciples
"They were the dirtiest men I ever saw. A most ragged lean and hungry set of wolves. Yet there was a dash about them that the northern men lacked." Maryland Resident upon seeing the Confederate Army
I'd like to point out that most of the blue contract variant shirts appear to have been eastern or New England state issue or part of Alexander Lane's (Philadelphia) contract in February 1864. Early western Federal portraits show a good number of contract shirts ranging from light to medium colored in both mixed and un-mixed yarns, likely in the off-white/light tan to medium gray range.
Brian White
[URL="http://wwandcompany.com"]Wambaugh, White, & Co.[/URL]
[URL="https://www.facebook.com/pages/Wambaugh-White-Company/114587141930517"]https://www.facebook.com/pages/Wambaugh-White-Company/114587141930517[/URL]
[email]brian@wwandcompany.com[/email]
The initial message recommends the waist belt have a leather loop but will accept a brass keeper. I hadn't thought about this distinction before.
I'm interested in learning about the reasons for this standard, ie: did certain units issue these types of belts (such as 12th Iowa), were brass keepers a late war idea, Eastern vs Western Theater, did this apply to US as well as CS?
Thanks for your reply.
Welcome to the forum, Mr. Albers. Unlike other forums, all posters must include their full signature in their posts. This constitutes your only notice. Please review the rules in the link : http://www.authentic-campaigner.com/...w_faq_item1998 - Silas Tackitt, one of the moderators.
Last edited by Silas; 01-19-2012, 04:25 PM.
Reason: Signature violation
Comment