If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Mark, anatomical. Think of your left hand and your right hand as a guide. Enlisted loop on the left, officers on the right. Go through every manual of arms and the sword in your head and it will make sense.
Sean, there is mention of one officer in a cap and blouse. So the officer of that company can go with a cap.
All else, refer to our posted guidelines and we'll do a convincing, uniform job.
Matt Woodburn
Retired Big Bug WIG/GHTI
Hiram Lodge #7, F&AM, Franklin, TN
"There is a fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
As officers weren't issued uniforms, they of course had more leeway in personalizing their look and didn't necessarily look much like the men they commanded.
Per the 1861 U.S. Army Regulations, all ranks and branches except enlisted men of the infantry were to wear their dress hats turned up on the right. (Left/right is from the point of view of the WEARER.) This was a holdover from the days when Scott's was the standard infantry manual, and the basic "carry" was in the left hand- making a brim sticking out on that side impractical. Of course, once the manual changed to the U.S. Rifle and Light Infantry Tactics this was reversed, with "shoulder arms" moving to the right arm. So, in typical army logic, the only men charged to wear their brims turned up on the left are the only ones that would have found it inconvenient.
Of course, officers wearing dress hats would THEORETICALLY also be wearing the officer's version- brim bound in black silk, three feathers, and silk embroidered insignia rather than brass. As Matt (who is the final arbiter for purposes of this event) mentioned above, photographic evidence shows a wide array of interpretations by volunteer officers who were, after all, commissioning their own clothing.
(OK Matt sneaked in a reply while I was typing, so some of this was already answered!)
Arch Campbell
Hairy Nation
Loyal Union League
Past Master of Martin Lodge #624, GL of Iowa AF & AM
"Secessionists and Rebel Traitors desiring a fight can be accomodated[sic]on demand." -David Moore
On the original hat it came with, the hook engaged into a cut in the brim slightly inside the two rows of stitching. This could easily have been installed this way by a prior collector enhancing a surplus hat, however I've seen other originals assembled with a slit in the brim. In an earlier conversation, someone stated that the hook was supposed to engage in a sewn loop or thread loop (as opposed to a metal eye), however I personally have not seen one like this and don't know the source of his information, though it sounds plausible.
Either way, the visual effect is the same. Only the portion of the plate below where it is narrowest (where the legs join the body) cover the upturned edge of the brim. The two loops of the plate only go through the hat crown, not the brim. Too often I see reenactor hats where the eagle plate sits too low and covers way too much of the brim.
I removed the hooks from the back of the eagle and made my own hooks out of brass wire, according to the pics back at the beginning of this thread. My soldering was pretty ugly, but you don't see that when the eagle is installed. ;)
To attach the eagle, I cut a small slit in the brim, just under the stitching as well as the crown just opposite the loops. A piece of leather from some old belting is run through the loops on the inside of the hat to hold the eagle in-place.
Here is an image of the 1855 cavalry hat, showing the embroidered eagel holding up teh brim and the cords:
I think some of the "problems" with the dress hat comes form some suters marketing/offering a M1858 AND a M1861 Hardee hat.
I have hypothesis that the Army took the eagle device from the 1854 shako which was worn on the front, and simply replaced the lower loop with a hook for the 1858 dress hat. And that vendors looked to artifact 1854 eagles and copied them moreso than the 1858 hooked version.
Uh oh. Tornado sirens.
Curt
Curt Schmidt
In gleichem Schritt und Tritt, Curt Schmidt
-Hard and sharp as flint...secret, and self-contained, and solitary as an oyster.
-Haplogroup R1b M343 (Subclade R1b1a2 M269)
-Pointless Folksy Wisdom Mess, Oblio Lodge #1
-Vastly Ignorant
-Often incorrect, technically, historically, factually.
I found that if I have my pin aligned like Mr. Wickett's the top of the pin is almost at the top of the crown of my hat. I had to lower it down a touch, but it is close. Now if I could just be better at soldering.
Jeff "Thad" Gallagher
Pit Rat Mess
49th Ohio
Huber Heights #777 F&AM
"The moralities of this company are not as good as they used to be, there is much swearing and abuse." Francis Kiene 49th OVI
Have a look at some of the originals on the ha.com site...
One or two show the eagle pretty close to the top of the crown. The crown of the hat in the pic I posted is every bit of 6" tall. However, if you've seen the old "Company Wag" article, you've seen the dimensions on a sampling of original hats, a significant portion of which had crowns less than 6" tall.
The one supplied to me for the event Bully Buy from Mr. Filthy William was one that has the two vertical prongs. I'd like to get the one with the 2 loops/hook combination. Anyone got one I can borrow? I don't have a solder gun, unfortunately.
Johnny Lloyd John "Johnny" Lloyd
Moderator Think before you post... Rules on this forum here SCAR
Known to associate with the following fine groups: WIG/AG/CR
"Without history, there can be no research standards.
Without research standards, there can be no authenticity.
Without the attempt at authenticity, all is just a fantasy.
Fantasy is not history nor heritage, because it never really existed." -Me
Comment