Not trying to start a flame war here, but I have a serious question/concern. If the WatchDog magazine claims to represent authenticity, then why do they attend and cover mainstream only venues? I can see trying to get your publication to all areas of reenacting, but it is my imagination or do they seem to have completely abandon the c/p/h end of the hobby? And if they have, why should I respect this publication?
Jim Butler
Jim Butler
Comment