Hello all,
I have done a great deal of research on an ancestor of mine but I have a question. Unfortunately, my ancestor was one of the many obscure soldiers. He left no diaries, no letters, etc; all I have to go off of is his pension records and other postwar documents. He was a Confederate soldier who served in the 19th Alabama Co. A. The unit served in the west at Shiloh, Chickamauga, Chattanooga, Atlanta, etc all the way to the surrender in North Carolina. From what I have found is that he enlisted in Aug/Sept 1861 and was discharged/paroled on April 9, 1865. From his postwar pension application, he lists that he had no wounds and a doctor's note also lists that he has no wounds and was in good shape for a man of his age.
This leads me to a dilemma. He obviously made it through the war (apparently without wounds). I know the odds are slim that he served in every battle and escaped unharmed. I'm sure he also served some time in hospitals and such during battles so could possibly have missed action that way. But, I'm asking to find out what the most likely situation was? Through y'alls personal research what do you think? Is it more likely that he served in many of the battles, missed most battles, or could it have been even? I'm just trying to complete this research as I try to get an image of who my ancestor was and what his experiences were like.
Thank you in advance,
Duane Hight
I have done a great deal of research on an ancestor of mine but I have a question. Unfortunately, my ancestor was one of the many obscure soldiers. He left no diaries, no letters, etc; all I have to go off of is his pension records and other postwar documents. He was a Confederate soldier who served in the 19th Alabama Co. A. The unit served in the west at Shiloh, Chickamauga, Chattanooga, Atlanta, etc all the way to the surrender in North Carolina. From what I have found is that he enlisted in Aug/Sept 1861 and was discharged/paroled on April 9, 1865. From his postwar pension application, he lists that he had no wounds and a doctor's note also lists that he has no wounds and was in good shape for a man of his age.
This leads me to a dilemma. He obviously made it through the war (apparently without wounds). I know the odds are slim that he served in every battle and escaped unharmed. I'm sure he also served some time in hospitals and such during battles so could possibly have missed action that way. But, I'm asking to find out what the most likely situation was? Through y'alls personal research what do you think? Is it more likely that he served in many of the battles, missed most battles, or could it have been even? I'm just trying to complete this research as I try to get an image of who my ancestor was and what his experiences were like.
Thank you in advance,
Duane Hight
Comment