Hi All-
I’m a longtime reenactor and living historian and (more recently) Ph.D. candidate in the History of American Civilization Program in the Department of History at the University of Delaware. My dissertation examines how Americans communicated about war and why combat became an “incommunicable experience” between the Revolutionary War and World War One. My final chapter considers how reenactors view both historical and reenacted combat, and in particular the experience known by various names including the “period rush.”
I’m posting here to open a conversation about this subject for research purposes. I would be happy to be in touch via email, phone, or in person with anyone who has something to say on these matters. You can email me directly at trputman@udel.edu.
I’d like to communicate with anyone interested in talking about these matters, but I would also welcome posts here if you feel so moved. Here are some particular questions you might consider:
How closely do you think reenactments can come to approximating what things were like in the past?
Have you experienced what some reenactors call a "period rush," a transportive moment of feeling as if reenacted things were real? What do you think causes these moments and what did you take away from such experiences?
How does the authenticity/accuracy of the material culture you use impact your reenacting experience?
Do you think the time period of or particular event being reenacted has an impact on how authentic it can seem? For instance, is it easier to have an authentic experience of the Civil War than of a WWII battle?
Are there things we can personally experience/understand through reenacting that we can’t through reading primary accounts?
Do you know what Civil War battles were like? Does this give you any insight into combat today?
Thanks for your time and I look forward to hearing from you.
Best Regards,
Tyler Putman
I’m a longtime reenactor and living historian and (more recently) Ph.D. candidate in the History of American Civilization Program in the Department of History at the University of Delaware. My dissertation examines how Americans communicated about war and why combat became an “incommunicable experience” between the Revolutionary War and World War One. My final chapter considers how reenactors view both historical and reenacted combat, and in particular the experience known by various names including the “period rush.”
I’m posting here to open a conversation about this subject for research purposes. I would be happy to be in touch via email, phone, or in person with anyone who has something to say on these matters. You can email me directly at trputman@udel.edu.
I’d like to communicate with anyone interested in talking about these matters, but I would also welcome posts here if you feel so moved. Here are some particular questions you might consider:
How closely do you think reenactments can come to approximating what things were like in the past?
Have you experienced what some reenactors call a "period rush," a transportive moment of feeling as if reenacted things were real? What do you think causes these moments and what did you take away from such experiences?
How does the authenticity/accuracy of the material culture you use impact your reenacting experience?
Do you think the time period of or particular event being reenacted has an impact on how authentic it can seem? For instance, is it easier to have an authentic experience of the Civil War than of a WWII battle?
Are there things we can personally experience/understand through reenacting that we can’t through reading primary accounts?
Do you know what Civil War battles were like? Does this give you any insight into combat today?
Thanks for your time and I look forward to hearing from you.
Best Regards,
Tyler Putman
Comment