Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
"Trash" Federal Import Lorenz Rifles
Collapse
X
-
Re: "Trash" Federal Import Lorenz Rifles
I don't think so. If I'm not mistaken, that lock plate is latter type seen on the M1862 version. It was the earlier M1854 version that was imported by the Confederate and federal governments. Here is a M1862 Lorenz, dated 1863, which has had the Wanzl breach loading conversion circa 1866 or 67. The link below for more info and pictures.
The reference to "junk" Lorenz rifles was probably referring to the fact that the Austrians sold off many M1854s which had seen extensive active service in Italy and were in pretty rough shape as a result. Another consideration is that the Lorenz rifle was not centrally manufactured but rather made at several arsenals and by many small gunsmiths contracted to make parts or whole guns. The quality, fit and finish of the contract-made guns varied wildly and the Austrians. The final factor is that the whoever the federal government hired to re-bore its Lorenzs from .54 to .58 seemed to have done a very poor job, hence the rifle's (undeserved) reputation for inaccuracy among federal troops.
The Wänzl is a lifting block design, similar in appearance and operation to the M1868 and later American Trapdoor Springfields. The rifle is single shot, and is loaded by drawing the hammer back to full cock and lifting the breechblock up and forward by the prominent lifting handle at the right rear of the block. The cartridge is hand inserted most of the way into the chamber and the spring loaded block is dropped back into the receiver, chambering the cartridge.Dave Schwartz,
Company B, 79th NY Vols.
(New York Highland Guard)
-
Re: "Trash" Federal Import Lorenz Rifles
Yep, that's the later model (1862) Austrian rifle which they made for their own use to replace the 1854, which saw considerable use by both sides.Craig L Barry
Editor, The Watchdog, a non-profit 501[c]3
Co-author (with David Burt) Suppliers to the Confederacy
Author, The Civil War Musket: A Handbook for Historical Accuracy
Member, Company of Military Historians
Comment
Comment