Re: what were the 4 most prized items for a soldier.
Indeed. Weaver seems to have been as attentive to his duties as possible under the grim conditions. Again, I would suspect the bodies still carrying valuable items like watches likely remained behind Union lines during the entire battle--this would certainly explain why they were not otherwise "pinched." Confederate troops were expert scroungers and I can't imagine them missing valuables unless, of course, the body was in such bad shape they didn't want to touch it or they simply didn't have time to pick it over thoroughly.
Here's another thought: I would submit that Weaver very likely did NOT list "inappropriate items" he may have found on bodies (e.g., playing cards, dice, liquor flasks, even pornographic material) since this might have caused undue stress to bereaved individuals and families seeking to pick up the effects of the deceased. Had the fastidious and respected Weaver found any inappropriate items, he undoubtedly ensured it was destroyed (Weaver was a respected citizen of Gettysburg and a "grand muck-a-muck" in the "Improved Order of Red Men").
An extensive discussion of Weaver's reburial activities is carried in William Franssanito's landmark "Early Photography at Gettysburg." I can't recommend it enough.
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
Originally posted by Pvt Schnapps
Here's another thought: I would submit that Weaver very likely did NOT list "inappropriate items" he may have found on bodies (e.g., playing cards, dice, liquor flasks, even pornographic material) since this might have caused undue stress to bereaved individuals and families seeking to pick up the effects of the deceased. Had the fastidious and respected Weaver found any inappropriate items, he undoubtedly ensured it was destroyed (Weaver was a respected citizen of Gettysburg and a "grand muck-a-muck" in the "Improved Order of Red Men").
An extensive discussion of Weaver's reburial activities is carried in William Franssanito's landmark "Early Photography at Gettysburg." I can't recommend it enough.
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
Comment