Re: Religion-Catholicism??
Gents,
Just because a mass is in Latin does not mean it is the old rite that you would have seen in 1860's. Any priest can say the new mass in Latin and many churches today offer this. If you are trying to find a mass as it would have been said in 1860 you need to find a church that does the pre-Vatican II rite (sometimes called Tridentine mass - which dates from 1570). The old mass is very different. The priest faces God (with his back to the people), the responses were said by the deacon or altar servers (not the people) - the people pretty much said nothing. It was very, very different from most Protestant services and would have been viewed with surprise and curiosity by newcomers. In one of John Adams's letters he describes seeing his first mass with all the incense and bells and chanting etc : "Here is everything which can lay hold of the eye, ear, and imagination..." Adams also assumed no one understood any of the Latin.
It is interesting that a Tridentine mass said today will be almost exactly what is was in 1860 - the language, the vestments, the gestures etc. The only difference I can think of is you will not see people saying the rosary during mass (which was common in the past but is now very much frowned upon). It would be the same mass that Father Ryan said for the 8th Tennessee or that Father Corby said at Gettysburg - no de-farbing needed!
Cordially,
Michael Shea
Gents,
Just because a mass is in Latin does not mean it is the old rite that you would have seen in 1860's. Any priest can say the new mass in Latin and many churches today offer this. If you are trying to find a mass as it would have been said in 1860 you need to find a church that does the pre-Vatican II rite (sometimes called Tridentine mass - which dates from 1570). The old mass is very different. The priest faces God (with his back to the people), the responses were said by the deacon or altar servers (not the people) - the people pretty much said nothing. It was very, very different from most Protestant services and would have been viewed with surprise and curiosity by newcomers. In one of John Adams's letters he describes seeing his first mass with all the incense and bells and chanting etc : "Here is everything which can lay hold of the eye, ear, and imagination..." Adams also assumed no one understood any of the Latin.
It is interesting that a Tridentine mass said today will be almost exactly what is was in 1860 - the language, the vestments, the gestures etc. The only difference I can think of is you will not see people saying the rosary during mass (which was common in the past but is now very much frowned upon). It would be the same mass that Father Ryan said for the 8th Tennessee or that Father Corby said at Gettysburg - no de-farbing needed!
Cordially,
Michael Shea
Comment