Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Teamster on picket duty?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Teamster on picket duty?

    While I was reading the history of the 38th Indiana Vol. Inf., I came across something that I have never heard of. A teamster from one of the the company's was doing picket duty. I was always under the impression that men employed on "extra duty" were exempt from such activities, they had enough on their plates. This took place in December of 1862 at Camp Andy Johnson outside of Nashville, just prior to the Federal Army moving out to push Bragg away from Murfreesboro.

    History of the 38th Ind. Vol. Inf., by Henry Fales Perry
    Published 1906, Palo Alto,Cal., F.A. Stuart The Printer

    Page 46
    "While at this camp an incident occurred which will always be remenbered by the comrades who were present.

    Several companies if not all of the Thirty-eighth were on picket duty a mile or so west of camp. Colonel Miholotzy of the Twenty-fourth Illinois was Officer of the Day.The night was pitchy dark and the escort of the Colonel carried a lantern. When halted at a reserve post by the sentinel,it was the duty of the officer in command of the post to turn out the guard and receive the Officer of the Day in due military form as laid down in the Army Regulations.

    Colonel Miholotzy,having seen service in foreign lands,was something of a stickler for military etiquette.He found something wrong at nearly every post of the Thirty-eighth.

    The sentinel on duty at the reserve of Company C was a TEAMSTER to whom all knowledge of "grand rounds" was a blank.

    The Colonel,upon being halted,waited a moment and then spluttered out,"What do you say?What do you say?"

    The teamster sentinel was nonplussed.To save his life he couldn't say,"Advance Grand Rounds,and give the countersign," but instead simply said,"Why, I thought it was some feller with his lantern going to feed his mules."

    To say the Colonel was furious would be putting it mildly.

    He had already arrested several company commanders,and it did not take long to add Lieut. Davis of Company C to his marching column.He made the prisoners march the "rounds" with him,then having cooled off,gave them a lecture in broken English,returned their swords,and dismissed them with orders to do their duty better."

    So I wonder who was taking care of this mans animals?
    sigpic
    Grandad Wm. David Lee
    52nd Tenn. Reg't Co. B


    "If You Ain't Right, Get Right!"
    - Uncle Dave Macon

    www.40thindiana.wordpress.com/

  • #2
    Re: Teamster on picket duty?

    why, the feller with the lantern!
    [B]Mike Wilkins[/B]

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Teamster on picket duty?

      Originally posted by Slouch View Post
      why, the feller with the lantern!
      Great answer!

      But my understanding of the regs is that the extra duty men recieved a little more pay and were not subject to such details. The reason as I understand it was that such duty would interfere with their military duties and exercises. Am I incorrect in thinking that having a teamster on picket would take away from his main duty, the animals in his charge?

      The only other type of situation close to this I have came across was in the diary of pvt. Garrett Larew (86th Ind.), who was transferred to the Pioneer Brigade before the battle of Murfreesboro. He wrote of having to do picket duty for a cavalry camp near them in either 1863-64. I'll have to dig the book out for a firm date.
      sigpic
      Grandad Wm. David Lee
      52nd Tenn. Reg't Co. B


      "If You Ain't Right, Get Right!"
      - Uncle Dave Macon

      www.40thindiana.wordpress.com/

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Teamster on picket duty?

        Perhaps the use of men on detail for other purposes was due to a lack of men in that particular area to serve as pickets, guards, etc. With at least one man per wagon, it seems you wouldnt need all those teamsters hanging around when the wagons were not moving. A handfull of teamsters could easily feed all the animals.

        I wonder, were the teamsters also charged with guarding the wagons when they were stationary?
        [B]Mike Wilkins[/B]

        Comment

        Working...
        X