Re: Best Civil War films (or rather, the lack thereof)...
Yep... when watching opera, the fat lady with the Viking horns by no way represents a true historical Viking...
I really did once meet Viking reenactors in Germany who were from Norway... wow, talk about unbathed and very hairy.
That was just the women. ;) LOL
But seriously-
I always got the feeling while watching Gangs things presented were a little too grubby/overblown/hellish. Yes, New York in that time was pretty foul, but just how foul were they would be appropriate to ask...
Yes, agreed, while Gangs is a fun film, it does further "murky the waters" of historical "accuracy" of Holly-weird... if such a thing can be achieved in Hollywood today. From Robin Hood with Errol Flynn in green tights, to Gone with the Wind Scarlett's bangs that didn't exist in real 1860s images, and other historical fiction movies of today, films have been making historians' jobs way harder in what they teach to the public/students.
Rhetorical question, I figure: Could Hollywood EVER make a very historically accurate film and tell the stories of history you and I know as they were known to have occurred? Is it budget (or lack of) that holds producers/directors from telling historical stories the way they actually occurred? Do producers thing that stories are too plain and need to embellish them in the name of "good storytelling"?
I've read of some fantastic stories of the War Between the States and many other instances in history that would make GREAT movies if they were told with attention to thoroughness and accuracy.
Such a shame. Oh well. -Johnny
Originally posted by FranklinGuardsNYSM
View Post
I really did once meet Viking reenactors in Germany who were from Norway... wow, talk about unbathed and very hairy.
That was just the women. ;) LOL
But seriously-
I always got the feeling while watching Gangs things presented were a little too grubby/overblown/hellish. Yes, New York in that time was pretty foul, but just how foul were they would be appropriate to ask...
Yes, agreed, while Gangs is a fun film, it does further "murky the waters" of historical "accuracy" of Holly-weird... if such a thing can be achieved in Hollywood today. From Robin Hood with Errol Flynn in green tights, to Gone with the Wind Scarlett's bangs that didn't exist in real 1860s images, and other historical fiction movies of today, films have been making historians' jobs way harder in what they teach to the public/students.
Rhetorical question, I figure: Could Hollywood EVER make a very historically accurate film and tell the stories of history you and I know as they were known to have occurred? Is it budget (or lack of) that holds producers/directors from telling historical stories the way they actually occurred? Do producers thing that stories are too plain and need to embellish them in the name of "good storytelling"?
I've read of some fantastic stories of the War Between the States and many other instances in history that would make GREAT movies if they were told with attention to thoroughness and accuracy.
Such a shame. Oh well. -Johnny
Comment