"We don't hold authenticity hostage to the highest bidder. Correct and affordable gear should be available to all.
-Ken Friedman"
Paul and all-
I own awesome items from Sullivan, Welch, ************, Daley, Duvall, Neill Rose (Brad Mallone, I believe actually made it according to Neill when I asked him). Currently, I am having a Morris item made as well as a John Peterson item. I have no problem paying for quality when the quality/price are right for my budget as well as if I need the gear for a particular, specific, and historical-evidence/research proven impression.
I have been greatly satisfied on the items I have bought from quality vendors/approved AC vendors when I compare them to originals or detailed pictures of originals. (And I don't mind giving an "atta-boy" when I am happy with vendor goods I have bought as well.) It's always neat to "discover" a quality vendor that doesn't have the "quality vendor price" too. (Isn't it for everybody?)
Not defending cheap, junky goods at all... but do you think he actually has a point here to discuss: The higher the price of goods, the more exclusive the hobby becomes to the "highest bidder"??
There are those in the hobby that complain that "attendance at quality events is dwindling". Could it be the overall price, AS WELL AS the cost of the gear (gas/flight to the event, etc. included)?
Is there a way we can mitigate higher prices for those that purchase quality goods without driving quality vendors out-of-business? Can we "have our cake and eat it too" in the vendor/hobbyist relationship. (I honestly don't know.)
I just pose the question for debate to all as well. I really honestly don't know how I feel on the matter yet, but I'd love to hear educated opinion. I mean, I can (mostly) afford the needed items for my impression and I have the ability to attend quality events as far as the money/time to get there is concerned. But I do have to admit the cost of the gear can, but not always, be sometimes prohibitive.
I can just imagine the plight of those with the initiative to attend quality events and improve their impressions who are monetarily poorer than I.
No "toe steppin' " here at all from me on anyone. I feel this is a debate I have heard all-too-often from others in the hobby on a personal level. I got love for everyone in the hobby in my own special way. :p;)
Again, I'm open to this conversation either way as I'm undecided on the subject and I don't informed enough for my personal liking here.
What are the group's thoughts?
Thanks- Johnny Lloyd
PS- Mods, please move if you feel necessary. I don't want to sidetrack the conversation on the quality of Provisional Supply, as it is a good one to talk openly about amongst the company of all. But Ken wrote something that jogged my mind a bit in this conversation I've heard some people say as well.
-Ken Friedman"
Paul and all-
I own awesome items from Sullivan, Welch, ************, Daley, Duvall, Neill Rose (Brad Mallone, I believe actually made it according to Neill when I asked him). Currently, I am having a Morris item made as well as a John Peterson item. I have no problem paying for quality when the quality/price are right for my budget as well as if I need the gear for a particular, specific, and historical-evidence/research proven impression.
I have been greatly satisfied on the items I have bought from quality vendors/approved AC vendors when I compare them to originals or detailed pictures of originals. (And I don't mind giving an "atta-boy" when I am happy with vendor goods I have bought as well.) It's always neat to "discover" a quality vendor that doesn't have the "quality vendor price" too. (Isn't it for everybody?)
Not defending cheap, junky goods at all... but do you think he actually has a point here to discuss: The higher the price of goods, the more exclusive the hobby becomes to the "highest bidder"??
There are those in the hobby that complain that "attendance at quality events is dwindling". Could it be the overall price, AS WELL AS the cost of the gear (gas/flight to the event, etc. included)?
Is there a way we can mitigate higher prices for those that purchase quality goods without driving quality vendors out-of-business? Can we "have our cake and eat it too" in the vendor/hobbyist relationship. (I honestly don't know.)
I just pose the question for debate to all as well. I really honestly don't know how I feel on the matter yet, but I'd love to hear educated opinion. I mean, I can (mostly) afford the needed items for my impression and I have the ability to attend quality events as far as the money/time to get there is concerned. But I do have to admit the cost of the gear can, but not always, be sometimes prohibitive.
I can just imagine the plight of those with the initiative to attend quality events and improve their impressions who are monetarily poorer than I.
No "toe steppin' " here at all from me on anyone. I feel this is a debate I have heard all-too-often from others in the hobby on a personal level. I got love for everyone in the hobby in my own special way. :p;)
Again, I'm open to this conversation either way as I'm undecided on the subject and I don't informed enough for my personal liking here.
What are the group's thoughts?
Thanks- Johnny Lloyd
PS- Mods, please move if you feel necessary. I don't want to sidetrack the conversation on the quality of Provisional Supply, as it is a good one to talk openly about amongst the company of all. But Ken wrote something that jogged my mind a bit in this conversation I've heard some people say as well.
Comment