Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Please read: Collectible Ordnance and the BATF

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Please read: Collectible Ordnance and the BATF

    I spoke with a close friend of mine today in order to get some clarification in this matter. My friend happens to be a senior BATF explosives supervisor with over 40 years of EOD experience. The following comes directly from someone who helped formulate their current position.

    All US military ordnance, regardless of whether it is live or inert, is the property of the United States government. How the items were obtained - purchased, found, etc. - is irrelevent. The items remain the property of the government, even if they are found "abandoned" on private property. The law does not consider the age of the items to be relevent, either. This also applies to any devices manufactured, purchased, used, or intended for use by the CONFEDERACY. Because the Confederacy lost the war, all CS weapons, supplies and equipment are considered "spoils of war", and are the property of the US government. While many items are sold to the public as surplus, the US government has never sold or made available surplus explosive devices to the public.

    When military ordnance is found, it generally becomes the responsibility of the US military to dispose of it. Unfortunately, this means disposal by counter-charging. They are not concerned with history or collectability.

    Possession of ANY explosive device - bombs, grenades, mines, etc. - is a FELONY. Again, the law does not recognize the age of a device when applied. This means that according to the law, a Shenkl shell, WWI Mills grenade, Japanese Knee mortar round, Claymore mine, or a homemade pipe bomb are all considered explosives devices, regardless of their age, rarity or historical significance. In other words, Sam White, as well as his customers, were in violation of Federal law by possessing these devices. Further, the letter of the law would consider that these devices, even after disarming, are STILL explosive devices, because their intended use was such.

    However, cooler heads prevail at the BATF. There are some there who recognize that there are devices that have historical and collectible value, and that there is a big difference between Joe the military buff and an al-Qaeda sympathizer or gang member. Therefore, they have adopted the basic position that they aren't going to raid anybody's Civil war collection, kick in doors at antique shops, or go after businessmen like Mr. White, until something happens. Usually that "something" is an explosion resulting in tragedy. When this happens, the likelihood is that any additional devices found on the premises, or associated with the event will be destroyed. In the case of Civil War-era UXO, each item would need to be x-rayed to determine whether or not the were still armed, an expensive and time-consuming process. Also, because of the thickness of the steel used in many CW devices, it is difficult to get a clear x-ray view that can verify whether a device is live or not. Because of this, all items may very well be destroyed, as erring on the side of caution may be the most prudent course of action. Remember, the primary mission of EOD personnel is to eliminate the threat of injury or death posed by UXO. Those in charge simply are not going to allow any additional casualties.

    It is not the job EOD personnel and BATF Explosive Enforcement Officers (EEOs) to render safe or disarm devices for anyone's personal collection. No squad is going to place any of their personnel in harm's way for such a thing. Conversely, once they find potentially hazardous items, they also are not going to give them back to the owner. Their job, first and foremost, is to prevent death and injury from these devices. Also, imagine the liability involved if they gave back an explosive device that later killed someone.

    So the deal is this: If you possess Civil War-era ordnance used or intended for the use of US or CS forces, it is remains the property of the Federal government. Further, if it is armed, you are in felony possesion of an explosive device. However, as long as nothing happens to draw your attention to the BATF, they aren't going to bother you. Their stance is reactive rather than proactive. But if something DOES happen, rest assured that they are going to recover the government's property and you will not get it back.

    Personally, I believe that this current BATF position is the most fair and amicable possible. It allows the collector or historian to obtain, disarm, display or otherwise possess potentially hazardous collectable items at their own risk until something happens. The only downside is the potential risk to others - family members, neighbors, etc., who may be completely unaware of the risks and end up being victims themselves. An important thing to remember is that this is the position of the BATF ONLY; other agencies will most dertainly have different policies.

    The bottom line is that nobody needs bombs in their homes. The liability and the potential for disaster simply are not worth it. A fire in the house could be catastrophic not only for the occupants, but for neighbors, passersby and rescue personnel. Also, homeowner's insurance does not cover damages caused by illegal explosives being stored in one's home.

    Military explosive devices are designed to kill and maim human beings, and regardless of their age or historical value, are to always be considered dangerous.

    Dave
    _________
    [B]Dave Fullarton[/B]

  • #2
    Re: Please read: Collectible Ordnance and the BATF

    Ask your friend to provide the page and paragraph number to the regs, I will then copy the regs and post them to the forum.
    Jim Kindred

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Please read: Collectible Ordnance and the BATF

      Dave,

      Thanks for the posting. I understand your rationalizing of the laws as being "fair", and it is important to comprehend the mindset of these Federal Agents. However, I see it as another reason to eliminate the BATF from our government.

      Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms belong on store shelves, not under the control of a Government.

      Other's mileage, of course, may vary... :)

      Respects,
      Tim Kindred
      Medical Mess
      Solar Star Lodge #14
      Bath, Maine

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Please read: Collectible Ordnance and the BATF

        "Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms belong on store shelves, not under the control of a Government."

        I agree - however, explosives are another issue altogether.

        Dave
        [B]Dave Fullarton[/B]

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Please read: Collectible Ordnance and the BATF

          "While many items are sold to the public as surplus, the US government has never sold or made available surplus explosive devices to the public."

          What about Bannerman??

          John Walsh
          John Walsh


          "Is a gentleman with a brostache invited to this party?''

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Please read: Collectible Ordnance and the BATF

            Here are the regulations as of the latest revision found:

            Black Powder Exemptions:



            (The manual online above is from 1982 but it says the same in the 09/2000 edition.)

            b) Black powder. Except for the provisions applicable to persons required to be licensed under subpart D, this part does not apply with respect to commercially manufactured black powder in quantities not to exceed 50 pounds, percussion caps, safety and pyrotechnic fuses, quills, quick and slow matches, and friction primers, if the black powder is intended to be used solely for sporting, recreational, or cultural purposes in antique firearms, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 921 (a)(1 6) or antique devices, as exempted from the term "destructive devices" in 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(4).



            "It should be noted that most Civil War artillery is field artillery and contains far less than 1 to 3 pounds of black power. It should also be noted that more than half of all artillery is solid in nature (i.e. never contained any powder but was used as a battering ram) or possessed a wood fuse adapter which over the years of being in the ground has subjected the shell's powder charge to moisture and contaminates. -Jack Melton Jr."





            Destructive Devices:

            ATF P 5300.4 - Federal Firearms Regulations Reference Guide 2005 (Revised - 09/2005)

            Section 5845(f) – Destructive device – The term “destructive device” means (1) any explosive, incendiary, or poison gas (A) bomb, (B) grenade, (C) rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces, (D) missile having an explosive or incendiary charge of more than one-quarter ounce, (E) mine, or (F) similar device; (2) any type of weapon by whatever name known which will, or which may be readily converted to expel a projectile…..



            The term “destructive device” shall not include any device which is neither designed nor redesigned for use as a weapon; any device, although originally designed for use as a weapon, which is redesigned for use as a signaling, pyrotechnic, line throwing, safety or similar device; surplus ordnance sold, loaned or given by the Secretary of the Army pursuant to the provisions of section4684(2), 4685, or 4686 of title 10 of the United States Code; or any other device which the secretary finds is not likely to be used as a weapon, or is an antique or is a rifle which the owner intends to use solely for sporting purposes.



            Section 179.25 Collector’s items.
            The director shall determine in accordance with 26 U.S.C 5845(a), whether a firearm or device , which although originally designed as a weapon, is by reason of the other characteristics primarily a collector’s item and is not likely to be used as a weapon. A person who desires to obtain a determination under that provision of the law shall follow the procedures prescribed in …..


            John Walsh
            John Walsh


            "Is a gentleman with a brostache invited to this party?''

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Please read: Collectible Ordnance and the BATF

              I honestly can't answer that. Bannerman obtained huge lots of surplus goods from many sources, as well as the Federal government. And it is quite possible that they did obtain some live ordnance from the government. It's also certainly possible that my source was mistaken and that the government did indeed allow such sales at one time. Certainly, it is no longer the case.

              The intent of my post was to point out the potential liabilities, legal and otherwise, of possessing military ordnance devices.

              Dave
              [B]Dave Fullarton[/B]

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Please read: Collectible Ordnance and the BATF

                The BTAF "experts" should look to the governments own manual of 16 June, 1972. The title is "CIVIL WAR EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE, 1861 - 1865".

                It was published by the U.S. NAVAL SCHOOL, EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL U.S. NAVAL ORDNANCE STATION, INDIAN HEAD, MARYLAND.

                It has X-rayes of most types of shells and their fuses. It has a section on how they are fused and how the fuses work and a whole section on how to safely disarm them.

                About 20 years ago the local EOD would defuse CW shells just to keep busy.

                I am with Tim, we don't need the BTAF. Their record of being over zelous stands for itself. In 25 years there have been two deaths and one injury from disarming CW projectiles. No telling how many have been disarmed during those years but it probably numbers in the thousands. Based on that, just about everything we do is more dangerous that a knowledgable person disarming CW shells.
                Last edited by Jimmayo; 02-25-2008, 04:50 PM. Reason: grammer
                Jim Mayo
                Portsmouth Rifles, Company G, 9th Va. Inf.

                CW Show and Tell Site
                http://www.angelfire.com/ma4/j_mayo/index.html

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Please read: Collectible Ordnance and the BATF

                  I know a person that scuba dives in the Pee Dee River and he has not found many armed shells. He even didn't have them disarmed. He even didn't find a Colt 1860 pistol preserved about two feet in the clay of the river bank. It's a good thing that he didn't find all these items or he could be in a lot of trouble. I was in Raymond, MS and a farmer plowing a field didn't find an armed shell. I bet there's many people who have not found many such items and that is a good thing because they could not get blown up!
                  Claude Sinclair
                  Palmetto Battalion

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Please read: Collectible Ordnance and the BATF

                    Am I honestly reading this correctly that the Civil War collectors who specialize in artillery are in violation of the law, according to the friend? Has every Civil War relic dealer been raided so that the BATF could determine whether each and every artillery shell qualifies as a collectors' item?
                    [FONT=Trebuchet MS]Joanna Norris Forbes[/FONT]

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Please read: Collectible Ordnance and the BATF

                      This also applies to any devices manufactured, purchased, used, or intended for use by the CONFEDERACY. Because the Confederacy lost the war, all CS weapons, supplies and equipment are considered "spoils of war", and are the property of the US government.
                      So, according to the above conscript it should be legal to collect British ordnance from the War of 1812. How about DPRK, VC, and PAVN ordnance from the last century?
                      [FONT=Times New Roman]-steve tyler-[/FONT]

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Please read: Collectible Ordnance and the BATF

                        Am I honestly reading this correctly that the Civil War collectors who specialize in artillery are in violation of the law, according to the friend?

                        No. Only those in possession of LIVE explosive devices are in violation of the law.

                        Has every Civil War relic dealer been raided so that the BATF could determine whether each and every artillery shell qualifies as a collectors' item?

                        No. As stated above, the BATF is not conducting raids with the intent to seize or examine CW artillery relics. They only get involved AFTER an incident involving a LIVE device.

                        So, according to the above conscript it should be legal to collect British ordnance from the War of 1812. How about DPRK, VC, and PAVN ordnance from the last century?

                        No. ANY live explosive ordnance, regardless of age, collectability, or historical significance, is ILLEGAL, plain and simple.
                        Last edited by Grenadier; 02-26-2008, 12:14 AM.
                        [B]Dave Fullarton[/B]

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          National Firearm Act items are another passion of mine...

                          Please help me understand

                          In the opening you posted “All US military ordnance, regardless of whether it is live or inert, is the property of the United States government”.

                          Then later you posted

                          “No. Only those in possession of LIVE explosive devices are in violation of the law.”

                          Uh…which is it.

                          As one with considerable BATFE NFA Branch / Tech Section dealings is your “friend” willing to issue a written statement on that ? Attorney James Bardwell, probably most noted expert on NFA issues and before tech constantly would certainly be interested in this ...I will forward him this thread.

                          Personally, having a clear understanding of the legalities of registering and possessing a destructive device (DD).... a live item would be considered a DD, you are absolutely correct in your second assertion.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Please read: Collectible Ordnance and the BATF

                            Two separate issues.

                            “All US military ordnance, regardless of whether it is live or inert, is the property of the United States government”.:

                            This is not necessarily a violation of any law, and refers to the possession of US government property.

                            "Only those in possession of LIVE explosive devices are in violation of the law.”:

                            This refers to Federal explosives laws, not the possession of government property.


                            No need for another statement - the position has been stated already. As I have stated earlier, I made my original post simply to bring attention to possible liabilities and risks with respect to CW ordnance devices. If you are in need of further clarification, I would suggest contacting the BATF directly.
                            [B]Dave Fullarton[/B]

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Please read: Collectible Ordnance and the BATF

                              Originally posted by Grenadier View Post
                              This is not necessarily a violation of any law, and refers to the possession of US government property.
                              Dave,

                              You may want to clarify this statement by posting the regulation or statute that backs it up. I own a number of firearms that are stamped "US Property" as well as other US military equipment to include vehicles yet the government no longer has a claim on them. I already know the answer to this but since you made the statement I will let you post the answer.

                              Oh, with regards to contacting ATF, I deal with them on a regular basis.
                              Last edited by JimKindred; 02-26-2008, 08:58 AM.
                              Jim Kindred

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X