Comrades - several of us have been discussing what the future holds for preservation oriented campaigner events and the presrvation movement in general. We are worried that we may be nearing "preservation march" burnout and so we need some new ideas for attracting more folks to this type of event and expanded ways to raise funds.
TAG and Lookout Mountain were good ideas that raised serious money - one was a campaigner immersion opposed event and the other a campaigner living history "climb for dollars." They are just the latest examples of the genre. Next year's Mansfield event will feature a campaigner battalion in the midst of a mainstream event with the main goal of raising money for preservation. One vendor has stepped up with a generous offer of donating a complete CS Tait or US fatigue uniform to the winner of a raffle, with all proceeds going to preservation - we expect that to be huge, but want to do more.
I am concerned that the same 200 of us are the ones most involved with the effort and that we may be missing some folks who are preservation oriented, but most importantly, folks who have access to citizens with serious money that we might tap for CWPT, etc.
Part of the problem seems to be that some of us are convinced preservation is the birthright of the campaigner, as if everybody else is not concerned about it and not worth approaching. This tends to limit our serious fund raising eforts to very authentic events attended by the same 200 folks.
One of the reasons I favor trying to convert mainstreamers to campaingers via the "Co I" concept is because we increase the pool of potential fund raisers and donors...and spread awareness.
We need to maintain our standards for events...but I wonder what else we can do to raise money within the rest of the hobby?
It galls us no end that huge mainstream events can make thousands of dollars for organizers and a pittance for preservation. So we shun these events and write them off as a lost cause. Now I do not advocate we lower our personal standards and concentrate on trying to convert these events and their participants...too hard. But I would like to hear from some folks with ideas about how we can use these events to raise funds and awareness.
The real money belongs to the corporations, obviously, and right now there does not appear to be a campaigner preservation liaison entity that can approach corporations for donations on behalf of CWPT, etc. CWPT has that connection but I am wondering what our role should be to assist? How do we fit in between CWPT, big mainstream event organizers and potential donors? Mike "Dusty" Chapman, John Cleveland, Craig Hadley, Rob Hodge and many others are doing yoeman's work organizing efforts and events, but do we need to come up with some kind of committee to work with events, preservation orgs and the hobby?
To sum up:
1. What can we do going forward to get more folks to campaigner preservation events?
2. What can we do to raise money and awareness at non-campaigner events?
3. Do we need a "preservation committee" of leading living historians whose main job would be to connect us better to CWPT and the other organizations? How can we make this into a more formal effort to allow us to approach sponsors and the hobby more efficiently?
This may already be happening and I have not heard out here in the Idaho territory. If not, add your thoughts and ideas.
Thanks
TAG and Lookout Mountain were good ideas that raised serious money - one was a campaigner immersion opposed event and the other a campaigner living history "climb for dollars." They are just the latest examples of the genre. Next year's Mansfield event will feature a campaigner battalion in the midst of a mainstream event with the main goal of raising money for preservation. One vendor has stepped up with a generous offer of donating a complete CS Tait or US fatigue uniform to the winner of a raffle, with all proceeds going to preservation - we expect that to be huge, but want to do more.
I am concerned that the same 200 of us are the ones most involved with the effort and that we may be missing some folks who are preservation oriented, but most importantly, folks who have access to citizens with serious money that we might tap for CWPT, etc.
Part of the problem seems to be that some of us are convinced preservation is the birthright of the campaigner, as if everybody else is not concerned about it and not worth approaching. This tends to limit our serious fund raising eforts to very authentic events attended by the same 200 folks.
One of the reasons I favor trying to convert mainstreamers to campaingers via the "Co I" concept is because we increase the pool of potential fund raisers and donors...and spread awareness.
We need to maintain our standards for events...but I wonder what else we can do to raise money within the rest of the hobby?
It galls us no end that huge mainstream events can make thousands of dollars for organizers and a pittance for preservation. So we shun these events and write them off as a lost cause. Now I do not advocate we lower our personal standards and concentrate on trying to convert these events and their participants...too hard. But I would like to hear from some folks with ideas about how we can use these events to raise funds and awareness.
The real money belongs to the corporations, obviously, and right now there does not appear to be a campaigner preservation liaison entity that can approach corporations for donations on behalf of CWPT, etc. CWPT has that connection but I am wondering what our role should be to assist? How do we fit in between CWPT, big mainstream event organizers and potential donors? Mike "Dusty" Chapman, John Cleveland, Craig Hadley, Rob Hodge and many others are doing yoeman's work organizing efforts and events, but do we need to come up with some kind of committee to work with events, preservation orgs and the hobby?
To sum up:
1. What can we do going forward to get more folks to campaigner preservation events?
2. What can we do to raise money and awareness at non-campaigner events?
3. Do we need a "preservation committee" of leading living historians whose main job would be to connect us better to CWPT and the other organizations? How can we make this into a more formal effort to allow us to approach sponsors and the hobby more efficiently?
This may already be happening and I have not heard out here in the Idaho territory. If not, add your thoughts and ideas.
Thanks
Comment