Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Civil War site in danger of developing

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Civil War site in danger of developing

    Civil War site in danger of developing
    By Karen Chaffraix
    06/15/2004
    The Fauquier Times-Democrat

    It was June 9, 1863 when 4.000 troops fought savagely upon the knolls of Fleetwood in Brandy Station, just over the Culpeper County line. The Union defeat marked the beginning of Robert E. Lee's Gettysburg campaign.

    Casualties were heavy and men were buried where they fell. A century and a half later, their bones could be churned up to build a subdivision.

    Protesters gathered in dripping heat and humidity last Wednesday morning at the site. They wanted to raise awareness: One of the country's most important Civil War sites is slated to be developed, they say.

    Golden Oaks Construction, Inc., a Northern Virginia Builders Association company, plans 18 units on 18.9 acres. The county has already approved the subdivision plat but will soon consider an appeal filed by the Brandy Station Foundation.

    Speakers at the demonstration included Sons of Confederate Veterans, historical author Virginia Morton ("Marching Through Culpeper"), Civil War Trust representatives, and film director Ron Maxwell ("Gods and Generals," "Gettysburg"), who delivered an impassioned plea for preserving the land.

    "I was more candid than usual," said Maxwell, who later in the week found himself defending his use of the word "carpet-bagger" to describe the developers.

    Maxwell has made historical films for 25 years and moved recently from California to Rappahannock county. He is adamant that the Culpeper area is rich not just in Civil War history, but in colonial, revolutionary and reconstruction history, and must not be paved over.

    "I was standing on the battlefield, soaking wet, and I could hear the sabers rattling, the guns going off," he said. "It's not an abstraction for me. It's visceral. The whole crucible of the Civil War is very personal for me.

    "They (the developers) must understand," he continued, "that many people are profoundly disturbed about what's happening. They are worried about our heritage and cultural history, about what we are going to leave for future generations."

    Sponsoring the event was the Brandy Station Foundation, formed in the 1980s to protect the Brandy Station Battlefield. Foundation president Bob Luddy said 20,000 cavalry men fought around Brandy Station. While some of the land has been acquired by historical conservators, he said, there is no zoning precluding development.

    Golden Oaks Construction, Inc. turned down two Brandy Station Foundation offers, exceeding their purchase price. The company purchased the land for $450,000 in April, according to Luddy. Golden Oaks attorney Randy Parks did not return phone calls.

    Sitting at the Graffiti House, a quarter-mile from Fleetwood, Luddy, retired from NASA, dispensed battlefield maps and conducted tours of Brandy Station battlefields.

    Seventy-one pieces of readable graffiti, 32 names and 18 drawings were discovered under wallpaper in the Graffiti house, a confederate field hospital after the battle, Luddy explained. The foundation purchased the house in 2002 to preserve it.

    "We have no problem with developing in the county," said Luddy. "But rather than build houses right here, the county could marshal its forces emphasizing the Civil War attractions."

    He said the sites, potential tourist magnets, would bring business into downtown Culpeper.

    Culpeper County Planning Director John Egertson said the Board of Zoning Appeals would meet this Thursday, and a date for considering the appeal would be set.

    Karen Chaffraix can be reached at kchaffraix@timespapers.com .



    ©Times Community Newspapers 2004
    [FONT=Lucida Sans Unicode][SIZE=4]Matt Crouch[/SIZE][/FONT]

    [COLOR=Blue][I]All of the top achievers I know are life-long learners... Looking for new skills, insights, and ideas. If they're not learning, they're not growing... not moving toward excellence. [/I][/COLOR] [B]Denis Waitley [/B]

  • #2
    Re: Civil War site in danger of developing

    It's beginning to alarm me is that more often"CARPET BAGGING" REAL ESTATE types are targetting specifically historically significant sites for their projects. This is striking me as spite on their parts. They know we have been beating them more often recently and can feel public opinion shifting against them generally. Just not at historic sites either. However, before their bubble bursts they are going to attempt to do the most amount of damage possible in the shortest amount of time.
    In my own area, where farmland preservation is the buzz word. Developers often target the most beautiful and productive land. Rather then the unproductive lands that have lain fallow for years. Rather then find old industrial brown fields for devloping new industrial sites or commercial. They move onto virgin land and rape it. This is stupid and is quite like allowing a rapist to roam at will in nursery. Anyway, this entire argument is beginning to go beyond the destruction of our Military Civil War heritage. It's the destruction of our kids and grandkids, or all future generations birth right. Not just the loss of our historic sites, bit all open space. As long as there are brown fields, as long as there are vacant blighted buildings, and abandoned downtown shopping districts, as long as our cities are going to shambles. There is no need for these homes on Fleetwood Hill, Chancellorsville, and on any other virgin land. There was and still is no need for the storage lockers at Trevillian Station. Right now development is not about jobs, it's not about the greater good. It's about greed, it's about our heritages' destruction for the personal profit of a few.
    Sorry guys/gals just my .02
    Barry Dusel

    In memory: Wm. Stanley, 6th PA Cav. Ernst C. Braun, 9th PA. Cav. John E. Brown & Edwin C. Brown, 23rd PVI

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Civil War site in danger of developing

      Originally posted by BarryDusel
      Right now development is not about jobs, it's not about the greater good. It's about greed, it's about our heritages' destruction for the personal profit of a few.
      Sorry guys/gals just my .02

      You hit the nail right on the head. All these carpet baggers think about is money. Who said Reconstuction was over?
      Jim Mayo
      Portsmouth Rifles, Company G, 9th Va. Inf.

      CW Show and Tell Site
      http://www.angelfire.com/ma4/j_mayo/index.html

      Comment

      Working...
      X