Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Development at Perryville

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A Call to Arms! Development at Perryville

    Hello All,
    Anyone who has been at Perryville knows what a pristine site it is, but now we have our first big problem. This article appeared in the Danville paper today. We have been fighting this for a 3 months but Danville Planning and Zoning finally caved on Wed. I urge all of you to call or write the City Council at the City Hall of Perryville, Kentucky and let them know that this is a bad idea. This farm is located on Hayes Mayes Rd. directly behind the battlefield. The light and noise from this development will impact the historic site.
    Amnews.com

    Zoning request approved for land in Historic Perryville
    By BOBBIE CURD
    bcurd@amnews.com

    A controversial rezoning request made by zoning commissioner Pete Coyle in November was narrowly approved Wednesday by a 5-4 vote. Coyle submitted the request to the Danville-Boyle County Planning and Zoning Committee to redesignate several acres of land zoned as agricultural to highway-commercial, single-family and multi-family housing, which he plans to sell for development purposes.

    The property is on West Second Street, and a part of the Coyle family farm.

    Since the request was made, residents and those interested in preserving the area's historical attractiveness attended meetings to voice concerns on how future developments would be overseen. Concerns were brought up about the possibility of Coyle selling the property, moving to Florida and leaving it in the hands of a developer who may not have the same passion for the historical value of the area as Coyle is said to.

    In January, P&Z Director Paula Bary advised Coyle and his engineer to come up with restrictions and covenants for the committee to review, which they did.

    Although Coyle was not present Wednesday for the continuance of the discussion, his engineer and newly-appointed attorney were. Several committee members were confused about Coyle's statement, recorded from January's meeting, indicating he was fine with giving the Perryville Battlefield and the City of Perryville all the rights of overseeing development in the area.

    Doug Gooch, with AGE Engineering, said what Coyle meant was after the covenants and restrictions were accepted, "Coyle is willing to turn over enforcement of covenants and restrictions, all the enforcement rights," but said the design of the buildings would be maintained within the restrictions.

    Daughters of the Confederates' Spokesperson Sherry Robinson, who has been in opposition to most of the idea, told the commission there were still questions as to why certain things were not in writing that Coyle had "given a gentleman's word" about. She said things like an agricultural easement or creation of a walking path on Old Mackville Road were not spelled out.

    State funding sought by committee

    Previously, Coyle said he was in talks with the battlefield's preservation committee, who was working with the state to secure funding on taking control of some of the land. Chris Kolakowski, director of the Perryville Enhancement Project, said that movement with the state has since stalled, but that his group and the state parks department were still interested.

    Perryville Mayor Anne Sleet said talks about enforcing any covenants or restrictions has not been discussed.

    "Our attorney said this was not to even be discussed until a plat was finalized through P&Z," Sleet said. She said Perryville is still working to create an ordinance to protect its historical buildings.

    "I feel like Mr. Coyle is being asked to make a lot of commitments, but no one is willing to make one back to him," said Commissioner Jeffrey Baird.

    An exchange took place between Baird and Kolakowski about a discrepancy in the difference between the city of Perryville being listed on the National Registry of Historical Districts, and the core battlefield preservation area. Kolakowski did demonstrate the entire city of Perryville is on the registry, but added Coyle seemed to be doing his job.

    "Two independent federal agencies have identified it as nationally historic. But I would say that Pete (Coyle) has done a good job of laying it out for us, by offering to let us enforce the area," Kolakowski said.

    Chairman Gary Chidester said most of the concerns would be met when the plats are presented to the board for approval, but offered some tough love for Coyle. He said Coyle had placed his engineer in a very tough position by not being at the meeting.

    "He needed to be here to talk to these people, and I think it's unfortunate that he's not. We recommended he be here," Chidester said.

    Baird said he felt Coyle was making the appropriate concessions, and felt the restrictions are in very good faith. He made the motion to accept the zone change with the exception that the wording be changed that the covenants can be enforced by the battlefield and the City of Perryville, not the design of the development.

    Jerry Leber seconded the motion, and also in favor were Hugh Mahon, George Johnson and John Forsythe.

    Committee members Chidester, Tommy Norville, Chris Hill and Becky Scholtz were opposed.

    Copyright The Advocate-Messenger 2008
    Chad Greene

  • #2
    Re: Development at Perryville

    I've been wandering how this last meeting was going to turn out. Not cool!:angry_smi
    You guys have more then a plate full to deal with here. I'll be gald to make a few phone calls and write a few letters to help support you all!
    Game face on!:baring_te
    Micah Trent
    Tar Water Mess/Mess No. 1
    Friends of Perryville Battlefield State Historic Site

    Comment


    • #3
      I recieved this e-mail today from Joni, Program Director at Perryville Battlefield:

      -Hello All,
      Two weeks ago the CWPT placed Perryville Battlefield on the top ten most endangered battlefield list due to a development that is set to be built on the edge of the battlefield.

      This development was approved by Boyle County Planning and Zoning, but the Perryville City Council still has to vote on it. You can voice your opposition by calling city hall at 859-332-8361 they are keeping a call log. The Perryville City Council will meet on this issue on April 3 at 7:00 P.M. to vote on the development. Perryville certainly needs economic development, but not on the edge of the battlefield. Please call now and voice your opposition - we need you.

      This article appeared in the Louisville Courier Journal.
      Please see below….

      Thanks,
      Joni
      The article she attached is being hosted by the Lexington Herald-Leader website: http://www.kentucky.com/471/story/346839.html
      Development eyed near Kentucky's biggest Civil War battlefield
      By BRUCE SCHREINER
      Associated Press Writer

      LOUISVILLE, Ky. --Homes and businesses may someday fill the landscape on a stretch of pristine property once within earshot of cannonfire from Kentucky's bloodiest Civil War battle.

      Landowner Pete Coyle envisions turning the approximately 34-acre tract on the edge of Perryville into a housing subdivision along with an assisted living center and limited commercial development.

      A national Civil War preservation group is so worried by the proposed development that it placed the Perryville battlefield site on a list of the nation's 10 most endangered Civil War battlefields.

      The designation this week comes amid a rezoning proposal that would clear the way for the development.

      The proposal won approval recently from a sharply divided Danville-Boyle County Planning and Zoning Commission but still must win backing from the Perryville City Council. Perryville Mayor Anne Sleet said Friday that she hasn't made up her mind on the plan.

      The development in the central Kentucky town about 85 miles southeast of Louisville would be visible from hilltops about a mile away at the battlefield, where more than 7,500 Union and Confederate soldiers were killed, wounded or missing after five hours of fighting in October 1862. A Confederate withdrawal after the battle secured Kentucky for the Union.

      The Perryville battlefield - which includes nearly 670 acres that have been preserved - has long been considered a historic gem because of little or no modern encroachments. The battlefield draws about 100,000 visitors yearly and has been the site of two national Civil War re-enactments this decade.

      "When you're here, you're in 1862," said Chris Kolakowski, executive director of the Perryville Enhancement Project, a preservationist group. "I could take any veteran of the Battle of Perryville ... out to the ground that they fought on, and they would be able to recognize where they were."

      The property wasn't the site of fighting but was a key transportation route as troops marched toward battle and some came back bloodied and wounded to be seen at makeshift hospitals, he said.

      Kolakowski said he'd prefer that the property remain undeveloped, but there's a bigger concern - an adjoining 52-acre rural tract closer to the battlefield.

      That property is also owned by Coyle, who has had talks with the state about a possible conservation easement to protect the 52 acres from development. Coyle said he hopes an agreement can be reached, but added, "anytime you're dealing with the state with budgets, you never know."

      The talks come at a time when Kentucky lawmakers are putting together the state's next spending plan while grappling with a nearly $900 million projected revenue shortfall over the next two years.

      "We are supportive of preserving this property, and we very much want to work with the landowner on it," said Gil Lawson, a spokesman for the state Commerce Cabinet, which includes the state parks department.

      "However, with the current state budget situation, funding for parks is very limited."

      The rural property is separated from the battlefield park by a 50-acre tract owned by someone else.

      Coyle envisions the subdivision becoming a haven for empty-nesters and retirees. The addition of just over 50 homes, the assisted living center and commercial development on a couple of lots would be a boon to the historic town of about 800, generating new tax revenue in a community with little growth opportunity, he said.

      "There's no other place to build in the city," he said. "So this is kind of a salvation for the city."

      James Lighthizer, president of the Civil War Preservation Trust, sees it differently. He said the rezoning applications threaten the "historical integrity of the area."

      It was the first time that the trust, a nonprofit battlefield preservation group, added the Perryville battlefield to its annual list of the nation's most endangered Civil War battlefields.

      Kenneth Noe, an Auburn University history professor who has written a book about the battle, said he was "floored" to see the Perryville battlefield added to the endangered list.

      "I can't think of anyone who has done a better job of preserving a battlefield than the people of Perryville and Boyle County," he said.

      He's worried about the proposed development and even more concerned about the precedent it might set. "It could have national implications," he said. "If it can happen at Perryville, it can happen anywhere."

      Kolakowski said it would be the first major residential development on the end of Perryville closest to the battlefield. "Do we want to see it stay agricultural? Yes," he said. "But we're realistic enough to know that may or may not be a possibility."

      The property includes a strip of land that was a road used by the Confederates to move soldiers to the front, haul supplies and transport wounded troops to hospitals. Coyle said he wants to see that strip turned into a hiking and biking trail that would lead from town to the battlefield.

      The development would be visible from a couple of hills at the battlefield, including one where Confederate artillery was positioned and soldiers moved to attack Union lines further west, Kolakowski said.

      "The way the terrain is out here, anything within about two or three miles of the park is going to be visible and is going to impact the vista and be an intrusion on the landscape," he said.

      Still, Kolakowski sounded conciliatory in discussing Coyle's development plans, with his bigger concern being safeguarding the 52 rural acres from development.

      "It's his property," Kolakowski said. "We're trying to balance his desire to develop it with preservation needs. We're trying to strike the best balance."

      Coyle said he'd like to see an outcome in which the 52 rural acres are left undeveloped.

      "There was blood shed there; people being carried back from the battlefield to the hospitals," he said. "It's still hallowed ground."
      Also, see the Civil War Preservation Trust: http://civilwar.org/mebr2008/Perryville.html

      I spent over four years living in central Kentucky while I was in college. Like many places in the country, it is growing faster and faster everyday. And even the more rural counties, like Boyle, are being touched by this growth. Anyone that has visited the Perryville Battlefield either as an event participant or just passing through will attest to how beautiful of a place it really is. I consider this park one of the very few gems that we have left because of how pristine it is given the condition of many battlefield parks now. I strongly encourage anyone that can spare a few minutes of their day to put in a quick phone call and let the local folks know you want Perryville Battlefield to remain as it is!
      Last edited by JimConley; 03-25-2008, 11:14 AM.
      Jim Conley

      Member, Civil War Trust

      "The 'right' events still leave much to be desired." - Patrick Lewis

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Development at Perryville

        When the subdivisions come in, eventually big box retail stores will follow, and with them come widened roads, etc. As a Hoosier, Perryville is as close to "my back yard" as ACW battlefields get! So, yeah, this concerns me.

        ...However, if Perryville isn't in your back yard, it is still a very special place. There are very few battlefields left where so much of the original ground is unaltered -AND- the surrounding area retains the rural/agricultural character it had at the time of the battle.

        If you've been there, you know what I'm talking about.

        If you haven't been there, go!

        I would like to encourage folks to voice their opposition to the development by calling the number in Jim's post!

        You know, in 2000 while preparing for the Rob Hodge's march, some of his literature said that the fate of most battlefield land would be decided within ten years... nearly 8 years has passed since then!
        John Wickett
        Former Carpetbagger
        Administrator (We got rules here! Be Nice - Sign Your Name - No Farbisms)

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Development at Perryville

          Gents,
          I'm going to email-bomb all 5,000 users in our database with this. Lets try to overwhelm their call center.

          Note - it ended up being closer to 4,000 ... some accounts have declined mailings. But, the email is out.
          Last edited by paulcalloway; 03-25-2008, 11:49 AM.
          Paul Calloway
          Proudest Member of the Tar Water Mess
          Proud Member of the GHTI
          Member, Civil War Preservation Trust
          Wayne #25, F&AM

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Development at Perryville

            Damn right, Wick! Well said, friend!

            Paul,
            That is a fantastic idea!

            All,
            I just placed my call. It literally only takes a minute. They ask for your name, phone number, and your stance on the issue. It couldn't be any easier! Take a minute on your lunch break or after work to give the folks at Perryville a call. I think it will really overwhelm these folks to know that people from all over the country care so much about the unique significance of their town.

            You know, one of the things John mentioned above that I didn't really touch on is how Perryville is one of those places close to home that really means a lot. I know that the entire re-enacting community in the Midwest cherish it because of how great and prisitine a place it really is. I've been visiting and attending events at Perryville for over ten years now and I would hate to see anything like this proposed development hurt it in any way! Certainly most people can understand having a place like Perryville that you've been to what seems like countless times and how much it means to you.

            I'll be making phone calls to friends and family today asking them to help.

            859-332-8361
            Jim Conley

            Member, Civil War Trust

            "The 'right' events still leave much to be desired." - Patrick Lewis

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Development at Perryville

              Made the call myself - mine took a little longer because the lady who answered patiently listened to me explain why I thought it was important not to develop the land bordering the battlefield.

              Easy - make the call.

              Note - I'm already getting reply emails from folks who made the call from our email blast. Outstanding.
              Paul Calloway
              Proudest Member of the Tar Water Mess
              Proud Member of the GHTI
              Member, Civil War Preservation Trust
              Wayne #25, F&AM

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Development at Perryville

                I found this email address for the city of Perryville:

                cityofperryville@bellsouth.net


                Brian Baird

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Development at Perryville

                  I'm glad you guys got through, several busy signals then finally got an answering machine. I left a message and will call back later.

                  Ernie W Steff

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Development at Perryville

                    I called also. There have been too many changes in the Perryville/Danville
                    area already.

                    Lisa Earle
                    [COLOR=purple][FONT=Comic Sans MS][B]Lisa Mullins[/B][/FONT][/COLOR]
                    [COLOR=purple][B][FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1]5th Tenn Co. E CSA[/SIZE][/FONT][/B][/COLOR]

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Development at Perryville

                      Paul-

                      I called today, no one picked-up the phone.

                      Is this a good sign???

                      Thanks- Johnny Lloyd
                      Johnny Lloyd
                      John "Johnny" Lloyd
                      Moderator
                      Think before you post... Rules on this forum here
                      SCAR
                      Known to associate with the following fine groups: WIG/AG/CR

                      "Without history, there can be no research standards.
                      Without research standards, there can be no authenticity.
                      Without the attempt at authenticity, all is just a fantasy.
                      Fantasy is not history nor heritage, because it never really existed." -Me


                      Proud descendant of...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Development at Perryville

                        Originally posted by Johnny Lloyd View Post
                        Paul-

                        I called today, no one picked-up the phone.

                        Is this a good sign???

                        Thanks- Johnny Lloyd
                        Yeah, I've had about 20 emails since I sent the e-blast saying "I called" or "can't get through". That poor lady answering the phone just got deluged.

                        Keep calling. If you get through, let us know over on the accompanying thread so we can keep this one for news.
                        Last edited by paulcalloway; 03-25-2008, 03:04 PM.
                        Paul Calloway
                        Proudest Member of the Tar Water Mess
                        Proud Member of the GHTI
                        Member, Civil War Preservation Trust
                        Wayne #25, F&AM

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Development at Perryville

                          Chad confirmed today that cityofperryville@bellsouth.net‏ is in-fact the email.

                          I still recommend calling as well. 859-332-8361 C'mon guys, it won't cost you but about $1 to call.
                          Paul Calloway
                          Proudest Member of the Tar Water Mess
                          Proud Member of the GHTI
                          Member, Civil War Preservation Trust
                          Wayne #25, F&AM

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Development at Perryville

                            Boys I'am callin in today to voice my oppinion about this STUPID idea:angry_smi It can't happen and hopefully we can stop it, the batlle field is at risk and we need to preserve the history for all who are callin in and vocin your oppinios.... thank you and we will win this battle.

                            Kyle Pretzl
                            Last edited by paulcalloway; 03-26-2008, 01:18 PM.
                            Kyle (Cuffie) Pretzl
                            The Tater Mess

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Development at Perryville

                              You may rely upon my call and support.

                              Erik Garrett
                              CPT, SC
                              US Army

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X