If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Sharpsburg because it stopped the invasion, kept England from recognizing the Confederacy, and allowed Lincoln to issue the Proclamation.
I believe the Proclamtion is often overlooked because after it was issued no European nation dared recognize the Confederacy and it gave the Union a chance to hurt the South by taking away capital and workers. This change in manpower took away Confederate slaves working in the fields and trenches and put them to work on the Northern side.
Ron Myers
1st US Infantry Co. D
First, even before the battle of Sharpsburg and the proclamation issuance, the North was utlizing "freed" slaves as labor (contraband of war). The popular "mythical", impact of the Emancipation Proclamation (a very overated legal document) was that it freed scores of slaves. In actuality it freed 0 slaves and was never ratified by the border states for which, it was targeted. It was important in the fact that to the outside world (Europe) it looked like the U.S. was attempting to phase out slavery but in reality the document had no legal or social impact on the status of slavery in this country. One could argue though that the "proclamation" helped open the door for the 13th. 14th. and 15th. admendments after the closure of the war. This was example of another of Lincoln's shrewd political and diplomatic moves that upon first examination appears to be a bold move, but further annalysis reveals its calculated impact was intentionally weak. Lincoln wished mearly to appease slavery's detractors abroad and to not legally and socially "rock the boat" here at home.
Second, the Gettysburg campaign was ill-concieved from the beginning as it had no clear objective other than having the ANV meander through the Northern countryside looking for the "the big desive battle" with the far more numerous and cagey AoP with the far reaching hope that the if a victory was acheived the North would capitualate and sue for peace. Even after the Confederate defeat at Gburg the AoP was slow to gain any immediate advantage and it was still took nearly two more years to reach its objective since the outset of the war: Richmond.
The Chattanooga campaign was the most important campaign because the Western armies regained the initiative (for good) and were able to drive towards their ultimate target: Atlanta. This subsequent campaign would do the most damage to the Confederate war effort striking at the heart of the Confederate homeland.
The Western armies (Cumberland, Ohio and Tennesee) had a much more daunting task in terms of geographical distance of its objectives and the responsibility of security for the conquered territory against the roaming calvary legions (Forest, Morgan and Wheeler). While, the AoP suffered from the prolonged ineptitude of poor leadership, lack of mental fortitude, and sustained initiative to forge just 100 miles to Richmond in four years, the Western armies meanwhile would go on to subdue the AoT sweep up along the southeast coast traveling thousands of miles in four years and close the back door on Lee's army thus entraping it. The war was clearly won in the West!
Jeremy Snyder
Jeremy Snyder WIG 150th Manassas
150th Athens
150th Wilson's Creek
150th Antietam
150th Fredericksburg
150th Marmaduke's Raid
150th Gettysburg
150th Corydon
150th Buffington Island LH
150th Ft. Sumter Boat Assault LH
150th Resaca
150th Pickett's Mill
150th Petersburg LH
150th Kennesaw Mountain. LH
150th Pilot Knob
150th Franklin LH
150th Ft. Fisher
150th Bentonville
150th Lincoln Funeral March
150th Grand Review March
150th Ft. Snelling Mustering Out LH
PS - for that matter where is Grant's Campaign into Va of 1864 -65? like I said that won the war!
The Overland Campaign.
Robert Johnson
"Them fellers out thar you ar goin up against, ain't none of the blue-bellied, white-livered Yanks and sassidge-eatin'forrin' hirelin's you have in Virginny that run atthe snap of a cap - they're Western fellers, an' they'll mighty quick give you a bellyful o' fightin."
In memory of: William Garry Co.H 5th USCC KIA 10/2/64 Saltville VA.
In response to Mr. Snyder: It is true that a strong case can be made that the Emancipation Proclamation acomplished little in the line of legal emancipation, however, to say that it has no social signifigance is a flasehood I feel. Beyond its affect on European views of the war and all that goes along with that, it certainly had immediate social effects here in the U.S. It simultaniously caused increased support for the war effort among radical republicans and abolitionists, while decreasing support from other demographics such as middle class midwestern farmers (Who at the time were a large part of the Federal enlisted force). It did a lot to further widen the gap already existing within the republican party and probably sent a fair amount of former republicans to the polls holding Democratic tickets in '64. Remember the 64 election wasnt as "in the bag" as is sometimes thought. The E.P. also helped give rise to growing anger among lower class immigrnats in northern metropolitan areas, known for their already democratic and anti-abolition views (recall the NYC draft riots). Finally, the issuing of the proclamation made abolition a clear war aim, changing the view of the entire conflict then and ever since.
As far as the original poll goes, Not truly a campaign in the sense of the others listed, but I have always believed Perryville is overlooked when dealing withthe critical moments of the war. A case can be made that the High Water Mark of the Confederacy was not at a copse of trees in PA, but on the rolling hills of KY 9 months earlier.
But in the end, as was mentioned at least once above, any of these events and all of them went on to play a huge role in the course of the war and the outcome. History does not exist in a vaccum, every event is affected by a previous one and goes on to affect another there after ad infinitum. My favorite historical concept: The Continuity of History Through Time.
[FONT=Book Antiqua]Justin Runyon[/FONT][FONT=Book Antiqua]; Pumpkin Patch Mess: [/FONT][FONT=Book Antiqua]WIG-GHTI[/FONT]
[FONT=Book Antiqua]Organization of American Historians[/FONT]
[FONT=Book Antiqua]Company of Military Historians[/FONT]
[FONT=Book Antiqua]CWPT, W.M., Terre Haute #19[/FONT][FONT=Book Antiqua] F&AM[/FONT]
[FONT=Book Antiqua]Terre Haute Chapter 11 RAM[/FONT]
Reference Mr. Snyder, what Mr. PumpkinheadFed said. :wink_smil
The Proclamation didn't free any slaves, but it gave Union soldiers the impetus to take in contrabands and take away from the Confederate war effort. Federal soldiers saw slaves helping the Southern war effort and decided the less slaves working in the fields and trenches the better chance of survivial for Federal soldiers. This was no myth. There are several references to this in letters and writings by Union men.
The effect is like an old-fashioned scale. One side weighs more than the other, and as weight is taken from the lighter to the heavier side the scale tips more and more to the side with more weight.
European intervention was compromised by the Proclamation. No English or French government was willing to side with Southern slavery when the North was moving away from and disavowing the institution. After initial criticism in English press of Lincoln of the edict, massive demonstrations of English labor supporting the North led the government into a policy of not recognizing the Confederacy. This isolated the South and foretold its doom.
Read James McPherson's account of Antietam Crossroads of Freedom: Antietam This is an excellent account of the campaign and aftermath!
Read James McPherson's account of Antietam Crossroads of Freedom: Antietam This is an excellent account of the campaign and aftermath!
Ron Myers
1st US Infantry Co. D
McPherson?? OK, I don't mean to sidetrack a great discussion here, but I do have a couple of opinions on that subject....
Gents on second thought I've decided to delete the post. I appreciate your thoughts. Suffice to say I believe there are better WBTS historians in print. Thanks.
Grant's Vicksburg Campaing was without a dout the most important campaign in the American Civil War. There are quite a few reasons for this. First, it opened up the Mississippi River for the farmers from the "Old Northwest Territory" Now they could get their crops to any place in the world.
Second, it cut the Confederacy (from the Mississiipi River to the Trans - Mississippi Confederacy.
Next, you have to study Grant's actual Vicksburg campaign. He tried every way in the world to get at Vicksburg, he finnially setted on a plan that was totally inconceivable at the time. Cut off his supply line and live off the land. Also, in doing this he was the First commander to make TOTAL warfare, not just against oposing ary but against the civilians that were backing that army and cause.. Take what you need and burn anything else of militay importance. This was NOT lost on his loyal LT., W.T. Sherman, which he later based the Georgial campaign. But, he got the idea from Grant.
Also, by this time, troop moral in the Western Theater was so high that they were almost invincible. (except for Rosecram's "screw up" at Chickamaugua) And again, Grant arrived in Chatanooga to straigten things out)
Also, by this time Grant was able to "cut political generals", such as McClerand, from gaing any real power.
Yes, Sherman's taking of Atlanta was VERY important, as it may have saved the political election in1864 for Lincoln, but all that Sherman used on this campaign and later ones, he learned from Grant.
Vicksburg was the turnning point in the war.
John M. Wedeward
33d Wisconsin
"The Raccoon Regiment"
Pvt. John Wedeward, Co. A, 42 Illinois Vol. Infantry
Cpl. Arnold Rader, Co. C, 46th Illinois Vol. Infantry
Brigadier Gen. John Fellows, 21st Continental Regiment
Grant's Vicksburg Campaing was without a dout the most important campaign in the American Civil War.
I have to totally agree with John there. Even with a Confederate victory at Gettysburg, the loss of Vicksburg would still have loomed large. The old saying "The war was won in the West" may indeed have been proved to be even more true in that case....
(Incidentally, you didn't REALLY say that word, did you? Time to hit the "edit" button pard!)
Rich Croxton
Rich Croxton
"I had fun. How about you?" -- In memory of Charles Heath, 1960-2009
Pvt. John Wedeward, Co. A, 42 Illinois Vol. Infantry
Cpl. Arnold Rader, Co. C, 46th Illinois Vol. Infantry
Brigadier Gen. John Fellows, 21st Continental Regiment
I agree with John and all of the prior posters concerning the Vicksburg Campaign. If anything the Vicksburg Campaign highlighted the lack of coordination between the various political entities and the logistics that the Confederacy had to cope with. The campaign in Vicksburg taught the Federals that the CSA couldn't coordinate logistics and reinforcements with the same organization and speed as the Union Army. Every flaw became evident, from the size of the railroad track gauges to food and water supplies and the lack of cooperation between commanders. This war was dictated by whomever controlled the roads, waterways and railroad systems. It didn't matter if you had 2000 tons of bacon in Montgomery, 8,000 troops in Meridian or 2 million cartridge rounds in the Atlanta Depot. If you didn't have the horses, wagons, roads, steamboats, teamsters, rolling stock, locomotives, secure rail lines, and above all the coordination to make it happen, "it" was going nowhere.
Gregory Deese
Carolina Rifles-Living History Association
http://www.carolinrifles.org
"How can you call yourself a campaigner if you've never campaigned?"-Charles Heath, R. I. P.
With some thought I do believe the Fort Donaldson fall was very important because the south lost Ky and 2/3 of Tn. and did not realy get any of it back for any length of time. Good question.
Jim "Doc" Bruce
Jim "Doc" Bruce
War means fightn and fightn means killn.
L 'audace, l 'audace, Toujours l 'audace.
Every man must know his limitations.
my only problem with that is that after the fall of new orleans and the taking of henry and donelson, what little amount of traffic on the river could only be passed by the defenses of vicksburg, effectively the river had already been cut. it became more of a symbolic victory, rather than having much tactical value at the time.
I'd have to agree with those of you on Atlanta. Had it not been for this critical Union victory, closely coupled with Sheridan's success in the Valley, Lincoln would probably never seen another term in the White House, and it's not too hard to predict what the results would've been with McClellan in office.
I gave the choices a great deal of thought, and concluded that selecting one was like an overweight, hard drinking, smoker who bungie jumps selecting the one thing that would most likely cause his death. The accumulative value exceeds the indvidual choices. Since some folks added battles that were not on the list, I too will digress from the poll choices and add Pea Ridge. Had the Confederates been able to threaten the Unions flank by controlling Missouri, it would have changed the Norths overall war plan. I add Pea Ridge to stand up for the Trans-Mississippi as having some importance in the overall war effort, something that the powers in Richmond failed to do.
Tom Yearby
Texas Ground Hornets
"I'd rather shoot a man than a snake." Robert Stumbling Bear
Comment