Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

    The Huntingdon Globe
    Huntington, Pennsylvania
    Nov 28, 1860
    Page: 1

    FARMERS’ CLOTHES

    There is a gradual change going on in society now-a-days, so that it is really fashionable to dress conveniently. The “dress” or swallow-tail coat is perhaps the most inconvenient and unsuitable article of dress to be worn out of doors that can be, and yet how many men go to church in this ball costume, and think they are well dressed. Our attention is called to this garment at this time by seeing from our office window a charcoal dealer, standing in the rain, dressed in black pantaloons and a dress coat. A red shirt and overalls would be appropriate, and with a blue frock he would look like a man of sense.

    Clothing should always be appropriate and convenient. In farm labors the body has to undergo as many peculiar bendings and take as many attitudes as in the sailor’s, but not as constantly. We go aloft in the barn, we climb fences, spring upon horseback, dig in narrow ditches, and go through all sorts of movements in using the axe and flail, the hoe and pick, the scythe and shovel,; and our clothing, like the sailors, should be loose and easy, warm, not in the way, and many-pocketed, A Dutchman’s frock is a good dress to go to market in; and, depend upon it, a farmer in a frock will be better attended to in market, whether he is purchaser or seller, than if he comes in an old-fashioned rusty broadcloth suit, like a poor gentleman, or decayed professional man. By his very dress he shows that he is not above his business, and buys and sells as a farmer.

    A sailor’s dress is after all not exactly the best dress for a farmer. The farmer should wear boots-thick, water-proof boots for much of his work. The sailor wears shoes. The pantaloons of the farmer should tuck into his boots, hence, as little cloth as possible should be in the legs. For our own part we like the style worn by the old countrymen, who breeches button moderately tight about the ankle and half way up the calf. Like the sailor’s, the farmers pantaloons should be supported by the waist-band and not by suspenders, unless indeed the man be grown corpulent, and like a barrel his waist is the thickest part of him,-and should be loose and full about the hips.

    It is most important that persons who are liable to profuse perspiration—and all men who labor are-should wear woolen garments next to the skin. Red fannel shirts are to be recommended for both summer and warm in winter, absorb the perspiration, and permit its evaporation without chilling the wearer. The color is bright and agreeable, and it prevents a soiled appearance before the shirt is really dirty. A knit shirt, particularly for winter wear as an outer garment while at work, tucked inside the waistband, is exceedingly comfortable; and when the regular sailor’s pea-jacket, made of good stout pilot cloth, just long enough to cover the hips, with liberal side-pockets, double breasted, and with a good collar to turn up to keep snow out of the neck, is worn outside, a man needs no better clothing for ordinary cold weather. There are no coat-tails or skirts in the way, no difficulty about getting one’s hands into his pockets, nothing superfluous and everything convenient; loose enough for every action, and close enough for warmth. The throat ought, never to be protected, (except when afflicted by a cold or cough; then keep it thoroughly warm,) except in cases of extreme exposure, like driving in a storm or great cold. Nothing makes the person more susceptible to lung and throat complaints than this bundling up with furs, or tippets, or comforters-good in their time, but greatly abused by our people by being used at all times.

    Finally-hats. A farmer is not exposed to falling ropes, or spars, or tackle-hence, does not need a stiff tarpaulin, like a sailor or a fireman. His hat should be cool and airy in the summer, and should give shade to his head and face. A light straw, palm-leaf, or chip hat, with a moderately broad brim and low crown, is the thing for the hot season. For the winter we need something which is warmer, which will not blow off easily, which will shade the eyes from the great glare of the sun on the snow, which will in a measure protect us from the rain, and which will not be in the way nor become easily injured. A cloth cap with liberal front-piece, or a medium or low-crowed soft felt hat, answers these requirements perfectly.

    As to color garments-the farmer should avoid black, unless he is in the habit of making and attending fashionable parties, and then he must, of course, conform to the mode. All the greys, pepper-and-salts, and great variety of browns commend themselves. Blue we avoid, because it is a color that has been adopted by the military, and has a sort of “U.S.A.” or “U.S.M.” look. Poor stock is oftener made up into black goods than into cloth of other colors-an additional reason why it is not profitable. It shows every speck of dirt, and when threadbare looks poverty-stricken enough.

    As to texture. Other things being equal, those goods which either possess a full nap or felty surface besides the thread, and thus are, though loosely woven, quite thick, and enclose considerable air, enclosed in their structure. A shaggy cloth, if not made of too coarse wool, though coarsely woven and loose in texture, will be found warmer than an equally heavy cloth which is woven compactly, and which has been sheared, carded and teazled till on every part the close short nap is laid in an even silky surface. Our clothes keep us warm not by keeping the air off, that is, from contact with the skin, but by surrounding us with a mass of air which is warm and by its adhesion to the fabrics with which we are clothed is not readily displaced, at least not before it imparts a portion of its warmth to the air which displaces it, and so prevents our feeling the chill. Outer garments with a long nap shed rain also much more readily than those with a fine-finished surfaace.

    The long and short of this matter is that we should have a regular working dress, which should be made with a view to convenience and decency only, and for other times clothing that can be worn and worn out without its appearing ridiculous. We are said to be the worst-dressed class of the population, and distinguished from others by being inappropriately and inconveniently dressed, and it is because we cannot say it is not so, that we have written the above. Let us make a change. –Condensed from The Homestead.
    Matthew Rector

  • #2
    Re: Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

    Matthew, that is a wonderful piece. There is lots of primary info. for the civilian interpreter here. Thanks for sharing that.

    One thing to keep in mind, I think, is that whenever a rural person went to town it was special event, due to it's infrequency. The farm family would put on their "Sunday Best" for an outing to town. This might account for the farming being seen by those "of the better sort" as out of place in their finery (or attempt at finery) when they showed up in town. I can't imagine a farmer driving a mule in a tail coat! It may have happened but it would seem incongruous. As an aside, the Courier & Ives prints look highly stylised in regards to clothing of the working class. They just look too squeaky clean and mighty stylish for farmers.
    C.W.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

      A most interesting read! Thank you - there is a lot there I wouldn't have thought of.

      I have two questions:

      1. Does the color red really help hide perspiration? (Having never worn red flannel before, I honestly don't know).

      2. I understand why inferior goods may have been dyed black (hides a multitude of sins in the fabric weave, I'm presuming), but wouldn't black hide dirt better? Or are they referring to dust, which would definitely show up on black?
      Celeste A. Kostyniuk

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

        Originally posted by CC sewing
        1. Does the color red really help hide perspiration? (Having never worn red flannel before, I honestly don't know).
        I'm reading that as two separate issues: 1) it absorbs perspiration, therefore avoiding that dreaded life-threatening condition, a chill, and 2) it shows dirt of all kinds less than a white shirt. But red wool doesn't tend to change color when wet like some fabrics.

        I understand why inferior goods may have been dyed black (hides a multitude of sins in the fabric weave, I'm presuming), but wouldn't black hide dirt better? Or are they referring to dust, which would definitely show up on black?
        For what it's worth, I have a black frock coat of expensive wool, and a brown frock coat of cheap wool, and the black frock coat is a magnet for every kind of hair and lint imaginable, so requires more attention to really look clean. The brown frock coat, even though it's cheap wool so doesn't shed dirt as well, probably picks up just as much hair and lint, but it looks cleaner with less work. And I think you're also right that dust is a factor as well.

        Hank Trent
        hanktrent@voyager.net
        Hank Trent

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

          I vaguely recall reading something about red flannel being more beneficial to your health. I cant find the source at this exact moment, but I will keep looking.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

            One possible source is the health philosophy of Jaeger, though it's post-period...

            My own working thought: red wool is insulative (healthful) and doesn't show dirt like a natural color wool would, so it also looks cleaner, longer--another "healthful" aspect. :)
            Regards,
            Elizabeth Clark

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

              Originally posted by ElizabethClark
              One possible source is the health philosophy of Jaeger, though it's post-period...

              My own working thought: red wool is insulative (healthful) and doesn't show dirt like a natural color wool would, so it also looks cleaner, longer--another "healthful" aspect. :)
              For all the publicity Jaeger and his sanitary undies would get in the union suit era, I think he was really just recycling the older idea of red flannel as being healthful. It shows up a lot in the decades before the Civil War. I was just over in google books trying to look up stuff on how market prices were collected for newspapers (not very successfully), and decided to look up red flannel. From Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, 1844:

              Red Flannel.--The very name red flannel brings to me a thousand recollections of old women with mountains of bandages round their heads, or of swelled knees and joints carefuly swathed like Egyptian mummies. It is really surprising to see the number of rolls which surround the heads of some of the aged and invalid poor. I have frequently endeavoured to effect their removal or diminution, but I always found I was touching on a sore point; and though I succeeded in some cases, I could evidently see there would be a struggle to return to the old red flannel as soon as my attendance was discontinued.

              But the red flannel is not used merely for warmth: it is looked upon as a sort of remedy in itself. In the same way as you would apply a blister or an ointment or a lotion, so you use the red flannel. But though the red flannel is so generally confided in by the poor, in this, as in many other instances, I have in vain sought from any of its supporters to obtain any precise idea of its modus operandi. The efficacy of red flannel must then be conceded, I suppose, as an ultimate fact, which must be granted, and not reasoned upon.
              Hank Trent
              hanktrent@voyager.net
              Hank Trent

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

                Hank,

                Though Mr. Rector's article pertains to civilian attire, I recall reading about the Wayne County, Va. Militia under Milton J. Ferguson in April 1861 wearing red flannel shirts. Most of them were farmers, laborers, etc. When they marched into Camp Tompkins at Coalsmouth, several of the other soldiers remarked at thier red shirts and called them the "blood-tubs".


                Capt. Nick Miller
                33rd O.V.I., Co. F
                "The Acorn Boys"
                Western Federal Blues

                "I love a brave soldier who has undergone the baptism of fire."-Napoleon Bonaparte
                [B][SIZE="3"]N.E. Miller[/SIZE][/B]

                [SIZE="2"][B][CENTER][I]"Live as brave men; and if fortune is adverse, front its blows with brave hearts"
                -Marcus Tullius Cicero[/I][/CENTER][/B][/SIZE]

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

                  Great stuff folks. Looks like I have picked up a part time interpretation role as a circa 1863-1883 Idaho farmer at a truly wonderful homesite only a mile from my new house out here.

                  The way I read this, my field garb might be:

                  Red flannel work shirt, course wool or cotton jean trousers of brown, drab, etc (not blue) and perhaps a pair of overalls. Boots and a straw hat/slouch hat. A pair of leather gloves might be nice as well.

                  To "go to town" might include the boots, slouch hat, sack coat, better wool jean or cotton jean trousers (or corduroy?), cotton or flannel shirt, vest in winter.

                  Also, "drab" as a color (undyed/natural jean) - know of a pair of original overalls like this - any idea how popular undyed laborer or farmer clothing might be?

                  Post war am thinking denim trousers and overalls may be more popular - thoughts?
                  Soli Deo Gloria
                  Doug Cooper

                  "The past is never dead. It's not even past." William Faulkner

                  Please support the CWT at www.civilwar.org

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

                    Originally posted by Hank Trent
                    For all the publicity Jaeger and his sanitary undies would get in the union suit era, I think he was really just recycling the older idea of red flannel as being healthful. It shows up a lot in the decades before the Civil War.
                    And, perhaps not surprisingly, afterwards, and by other countries.

                    Well into the 1930s, many British officers, in India and other hotter climes, wore red flannel shirts with a removable quilted pad that covered the spine from the back nape of the neck to the mid-lower back. The theory was that "insulating the spine" averted heat stroke.

                    Never mind, they're Brits, you know.

                    Also, I believe the Germans in North Africa in WWII lined their pith helmets and soft caps with a red flannel or cotton for much the same reason.
                    Lynn Kessler
                    Co. C
                    Chesapeake Volunteer Guards
                    The Southern Division

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

                      Matt
                      What an excellent article!
                      For anyone else interested in really getting all worked up over civilian clothing I might recommend...
                      Ready-Made Democracy: A History of Men's Dress in the American Republic, 1760-1860 by Michael Zakim

                      While it falls short of our era just slightly it is a great book. Wordy but an awesome read.
                      Drew Gruber
                      Drew

                      "God knows, as many posts as go up on this site everyday, there's plenty of folks who know how to type. Put those keyboards to work on a real issue that's tied to the history that we love and obsess over so much." F.B.

                      "...mow hay, cut wood, prepare great food, drink schwitzel, knit, sew, spin wool, rock out to a good pinch of snuff and somehow still find time to go fly a kite." N.B.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

                        As to "Why red?" Remember that red dyes were some of the cheapest dyes on the market...so if it must be a color, red is an affordable choice. It was also one of the easiest colors to see against a drab world, so you could see where he/she is in the field/ woods/ snowstorm (good choice in an era before florecent orange). Dark colors absorb heat, light colors reflect heat away, so if sweating is thought to be healthful, you want to trap that heat rather than letting it get away.
                        ...Just some thoughts...
                        -Elaine "Ivy Wolf" Kessinger

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

                          Originally posted by DougCooper
                          Great stuff folks. Looks like I have picked up a part time interpretation role as a circa 1863-1883 Idaho farmer at a truly wonderful homesite only a mile from my new house out here.

                          The way I read this, my field garb might be:

                          Red flannel work shirt, course wool or cotton jean trousers of brown, drab, etc (not blue) and perhaps a pair of overalls. Boots and a straw hat/slouch hat. A pair of leather gloves might be nice as well.

                          To "go to town" might include the boots, slouch hat, sack coat, better wool jean or cotton jean trousers (or corduroy?), cotton or flannel shirt, vest in winter.

                          Also, "drab" as a color (undyed/natural jean) - know of a pair of original overalls like this - any idea how popular undyed laborer or farmer clothing might be?

                          I sort of read this as only a period What Not To Wear episode. If people were already doing what the article is trying to get them to do then what's the need for the article unless they're aiming it at a small group of the farmer population that are too stubborn to get with it? If that small portion was small enough then why bother? How hip was Huntington I'd like to know.
                          [COLOR="Olive"][FONT="Arial Narrow"]Larry Pettiford[/FONT][/COLOR]

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

                            Originally posted by cap tassel
                            I sort of read this as only a period What Not To Wear episode. If people were already doing what the article is trying to get them to do then what's the need for the article unless they're aiming it at a small group of the farmer population that are too stubborn to get with it? If that small portion was small enough then why bother? How hip was Huntington I'd like to know.
                            The irony is that most of it sounds pretty close to what one sees in images, with the exception of going to town. And there it seems the thrust of the article is that one should not be ashamed to dress like an honest farmer in town, rather than to try to dress better than one's class in shabby looking business-man's or Sunday-best type clothes.

                            It fits with the general advice articles against women wearing too-tight corsets, or low-cut dresses and thin shoes in cold weather, and the general trend in the 1850s of clothes becoming less formal, less restrictive and more comfortable. You shouldn't feel pressure to wear a tailcoat to haul chickens to market--wear what's practical!

                            Some of it was self-congratulatory, some of it was just chiming in with what everyone else was saying, some of it like the article in question appears to be motivated by seeing those who weren't getting with the program. I've always thought that the classic Uncle Sam charicature, if you take away the patriotic color scheme, is a good example of an old country fellow all dressed up for town, trying to look fashionable and not quite succeeding--a symbol of America's rough-hewn roots as it became an influence in the "town" of the world, and a type that any city person would have been able to recognize, like the "charcoal dealer, standing in the rain, dressed in black pantaloons and a dress coat [tailcoat]" that frustrated the author of the article. I've got some black wool cloth with a tinge of green to it, that I'm saving to make a tailcoat when I'm old enough to really pull off that look.

                            So, in my opinion, I think the author is more motivated to praise farmers' actual everyday working clothes, to the point that he thinks they should wear such practical attire anywhere and not be ashamed of it.

                            In real life, one can look at paintings of men in town like Bingham's election one (a little earlier) and see a mix of men dressed up and dressed down. But I'm not sure that those who dressed up saw themselves as having a shabby genteel, out-of-fashion look, like the author of the article. I think they probably thought their best coat was their best coat and made them look better than their working clothes. It probably took a true generational change, like the generation of old men who've died off today from the 1950s-1960s, who always wore hats with suits, or the women who always wore hats and gloves, before the last old farmers quit wanting to wear tailcoats to town.

                            Hank Trent
                            hanktrent@voyager.net
                            Hank Trent

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Some thoughts about Farmers’ Clothes

                              Speaking of farming and dress, I had my good friend Tim Parsons come by the farm and take some images of us shocking corn and working my horses. Thought you all might enjoy these. The image is taken by Tim Parsons and Chad Gray, Cliff Kelley, and myself and my 2 babies Jenny and Bella
                              Attached Files
                              Kaelin R. Vernon
                              SOUTH UNION GUARD


                              "Do small things with great love" -Mother Teresa

                              " Put your hands to work and your hearts to God" -Mother Ann Lee

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X