While reading a back issue of "Citizen's Companion", I came across the following in reference to the Garibaldi blouse:
"Also, these waists were considered undergarments, just as men's shirts were, and were not worn alone."
Two pages later, in an article by a different author about a different but related subject, there is a period photo of a young woman wearing a garibaldi blouse with no jacket at all.
This is a bit confusing. I realize that not all writers know what they are talking about but the author of the article seemed to have very good credentials. Yet, a period photo completely contradicts what she had said.
What's the correct way to wear one of these? With or without a jacket or either way?
"Also, these waists were considered undergarments, just as men's shirts were, and were not worn alone."
Two pages later, in an article by a different author about a different but related subject, there is a period photo of a young woman wearing a garibaldi blouse with no jacket at all.
This is a bit confusing. I realize that not all writers know what they are talking about but the author of the article seemed to have very good credentials. Yet, a period photo completely contradicts what she had said.
What's the correct way to wear one of these? With or without a jacket or either way?
Comment