Re: hair accessories
Nope, not for the hair. For sleeves.
Here's the patent issued June 24, 1862: http://www.google.com/patents?id=YD1...s_maxy_is=1862
"Improvement in Sleeve-Fasteners...a new or Improved Sleeve Catch-Up or Fastener...The particular object of a sleeve catch-up is to fasten the sleeves of a child's dress when looped or contracted at the shoudler. It may also be employed as a wristband-fastening."
The patent illustration shows a back that does look like a modern barette. Wonder if this use as a sleeve fastener could also shed any light on the original artifact?
Hank Trent
hanktrent@voyager.net
Originally posted by bizzilizzit
View Post
Here's the patent issued June 24, 1862: http://www.google.com/patents?id=YD1...s_maxy_is=1862
"Improvement in Sleeve-Fasteners...a new or Improved Sleeve Catch-Up or Fastener...The particular object of a sleeve catch-up is to fasten the sleeves of a child's dress when looped or contracted at the shoudler. It may also be employed as a wristband-fastening."
The patent illustration shows a back that does look like a modern barette. Wonder if this use as a sleeve fastener could also shed any light on the original artifact?
Hank Trent
hanktrent@voyager.net
Comment